Divine supernatural elements, even when derived using a logical and rational scientific method, are still theories, and you shouldn’t believe them to be infallibly true, because they aren’t. Our human desire to grasp the origin of this world, or the universe, prompted many metaphysical religious beliefs in order to answer something inherently unknown. This is the same thing science does in justifying the big bang or string theory, etc. Don’t believe in these theories, nor suppose they are not true, without sufficient evidence and rational non-contradictory proofs, and even then, I argue, we must maintain that they are veiled of their true nature through the biological filter in which we intuit them. We ought to withhold judgments upon things we do not know to be true, and admit deficiency in accuracy when making claims. It is completely honest, objectively, to state that you believe something to be true, and it is completely dishonest, to state that it is absolutely true.

I may passionately believe certain things are right or wrong, good or bad, or in this sense, true or false, yet I also believe that they are not the limit of what I could potentially know, in other words, the beliefs are held due to my subjective experience, but the belief in something more accurate yet unknown as a possibility is still simultaneously held as a constant. This is the groundwork fallibilism, of a state of mind which is open to experience, never finding a permanent answer, only a workable temporary one. Our state of being, whether we like it or not, is constantly in a process of becoming updated, refined, or changed, as new evidence and novel experiences provide insight into a better conceptualization in alignment with reality. The mode of being fallible, consciously, opens us up to this process, and does not hinder it from working in beneficial and useful ways, but on the contrary, encourages it. The personality trait openness defines the mode of Being which is characterized be an inability to maintain rigid, formal, concrete, idealistic views of the world, and rather seeks to uncover novel articulations, and novel experiences. In refraining from a concrete framework, and attempting to navigate one’s state of being away from absolute certainty, we become open to novel, sometimes abstract, sometimes difficult to accept, articulations and beliefs that would otherwise be repudiated from their conception.