On Accrediting “Novel” Ideas

Originally Written: September 14th 2019

There are philosophical schools of thought, grand intuitions, and discovered intellectual formulations which we credit the totality of to the one individual who popularized the crowning articulation of the content. In this way, we make philosophers famous, scientists rise to the top of their fields, and and through their popularity the great thinkers become immortalized for their discoveries. We often credit those of a more celebrated nature, those who becomes influential and acquire fame through said discoveries, those philosophers, scientists, and great thinkers, with the totality of the content they produce. The truth is, all ideas, all seemingly new discoveries or original conceptions, have their roots in prior generations of thought. One may think a new philosopher has unique insight, when the causal chain from hundreds to thousands of years shows that an idea existed long before the newly publicized exposition of it. Often times it is merely a novel articulation, or a popularization of a pre-existing idea, which consciously known by the individual or not, that gets its association attached to these great thinkers and thus immortalizes their names. This doesn’t mean we don’t owe credit to the popularizers, the combiners of knowledge, those that put together the collection of generations of work into a single articulation, merely, we must recognize those situations for what they are, as being an accumulated effort, culminating in the insight of an individual. We owe any novel discovery to the historicity that precedes us and informs us to be led towards its uncovering.  We think Darwin “discovered” evolution, when hundreds conceptualized parts of the same ideas for hundreds of years before. I’ve found philosophers or psychologists who write endlessly about ideas where their exact form has existed elsewhere for hundreds if not thousands of years. Now it’s possible they came to the same conclusion without prior knowledge, it’s also possible they in good faith promote the idea without remembering to credit the original source.

Voracious readers and academic scholars have read hundreds of books, and henceforth develop their own works, without realizing the influence or causal nature of their current thoughts in the works of past writers. We notice such things occurring in our day to day life, we accredit our morality or actions to the individuals we are, as being a representation of ourselves. This is quite true, but only a partial painting of the picture. The influences and conditions needed to produce such individuality are vast and perhaps impossible to pin down in their direct influence, but they exist. Our moments are formed by forces which have evolved over thousands of years, our DNA, our parental and immediate circumstantial factors, our depth of knowledge into certain subjects, taught or introduced through causal chains older than consciously recollected. But it is possible to realize our condition, to transcend the contradictions between individual conscious moments, unconscious factors, and prior causes. We can include in our picture of our current actions, thoughts, speech, that it is itself a representation of who we are in the moment, yet conditioned by a causal chain of far reaching factors. The moment is in its facticity the universe expressing itself, not only in us as an individual, but in every part of us as pieces of the whole, and as us as the collection of parts forming an individual organism, itself as part of a whole reality. Where ignorance is a given in explaining any phenomenon, admittance of ignorance, and a general admission of the conditionality inherent in any phenomenal “uncovering” leads to a more truthful representation of reality, where we cannot give all the blame to ignorance, we can refrain from falsely accrediting the entirety of a conceptualization, in an ultimate manner, to ourselves, and recognize the broader structure to which we currently are only a small representation of.

Dialectical Methodology in Conscious Advancement

Originally Written: August 3rd 2019

Conscious satisfaction with our current state of understanding, character, mode of Being, and progression towards values limits us in our ability to manifest our potentiality. Regardless, the instinctive movement towards greater perceptual intuition, and enhancement of cognitive navigation of phenomena, naturally increases as our perceptible data is accumulated throughout every moment. Whether we consciously encourage the progression towards greater heights of understanding, cognitively remain stagnant in pursuits of learning or further articulation of ideas, or hinder progress through pursuing falsehood, our natural inclination is to seek to rectify dissonance and contradiction through our rational faculty. This is necessarily done in a way that progresses the state of consciousness, or the “Spirit” as Hegel regards our “Being”, in its totality, towards higher “transcendental” states of understanding. In the realm of wisdom, morality can always be improved, in the realm of knowledge, articulations can always be refined and improved upon, transcended and surpassed. We can always make progress towards greater articulation and actualization of our value system’s priorities. This becomes greatly accentuated through conscious direction, and diligent effort.

Our ability to conceptualize appearances of truth into statements about reality is limited by time, language, and experience, but at the same time progressable through the same metrics, if utilized in accordance with consciously constructed abstractions of the underlying value system. Time goes on, and new concepts can be introduced, and experience grows. Our perceptions are altered as their datum increases through the very instantiation of our perceptible ability which courses through life. As time goes on, and our conceptual vocabulary is improved upon, as concentration upon awareness of reality develops new meanings to new concepts, consciousness itself grows in its understanding, that is, if it is concentrated on the improvement of said knowledge in a way that is fact checking itself in corresponding to reality. While requiring intellectual vigor and philosophical inclination towards progress towards higher abstractions, such processes can be implemented by anyone at any level for practical results.

The integration between the experienced and the abstract, and the constant flow of experience and abstraction, flows to deeper understanding if one never reaches a point of satisfaction or complacency. As you improve skill with experience, you also improve understanding with time, which is itself directly intuitable in our experience. Directed consciousness in an intentional direction, over time, produces experience in said direction, and leads to improvement if worked through a Hegelian process of dialectic movement. This dialectical movement towards advancement of current knowledge works through the experiencing of new knowledge contradicting old knowledge, the recognition of two contradictory truths, their transcendence into a new truth which superseded yet includes both discovered truths, and the emergence of an all-encapsulating conception. This now becomes the initial truth, change occurs and through renewed attention new knowledge develops contradicting the new founded knowledge, and their transcendence is required again to move on.

For example, this whole process is only discoverable because something is. Something is, which is Being. This Being which we recognize is a type of being which we conceptualize as human, a human being (me). We intuit that something is permanent, is lasting and unchanging, perhaps our view of our “self”, or of physical objects. The being comes to notice through phenomenological analysis that its contents are impermanent. Through science we find all conditioned things are found impermanent as well. The inner world, the outer world.  Everything must be impermanent, changing. What is unchanging always is permanent. What doesn’t change, is impermanent. Everything is impermanent. Two concepts, one consciousness. Two contradictions, one understanding, both consciously held, produces cognitive dissonance and internal confusion through their contradiction. The resolution, the permanence of impermanence, is recognized, as the type of being which reality has. The unity of the contradictory truths are found in conceptual understanding that the absolute concept (Hegelian Notion) contains the truth of a constant impermanence from the perspective of the Being which is human. From this conceptual standpoint one has traversed multiple underlying truths which are, in their divided essences, incompatible, but in their unity, a truthful depiction of reality as it currently has been found by the observer.

As long as the understanding focuses on developing the conceptualization, of not ending the conversation, experience, time, abstraction only grows from this point. One may come to see that the unity is only such due to the mind which is itself not divisible from the unity yet a part of the unity, but itself as much the unity as any other point, at the same time it is creating the unity which is appearing to itself within consciousness. One may come to conceptualize the consciousness that is abstracting as separate from the abstraction. That there is the object (the abstraction of consciousness (unity of permanence of impermanence)) as well as the subject (consciousness itself). These can become, themselves, two objects recognized within consciousness, one containing the unity of previously discovered truth, one the consciousness which recognizes, both appearing in the content of consciousness. Two conceptualizations of the state of affairs as they appear within one consciousness. Through development of understanding we see that it is consciousness itself creating both concepts within itself, which itself can be infinitely conceptualized, until the realization dawns that anything appearing in consciousness, is merely appearing in consciousness, and that experience is what is currently happening within this moment, subjectively, yet perceived as an objective fact. This itself becomes a truth of the moment, its realization quickly superseded by the next interjected moment of awareness containing fresh content (if your mindful you can notice), only possible, through the impermanent nature of all phenomena. In this way our understanding formulates a conceptualization of reality, it is contradicted by a subsequent truth, both truths must be integrated, and through their transcendence, that is, a higher resolution image which includes both, we are successfully able to integrate both ideas into a world view which houses them and is able to contain them both without contradiction. This process, albeit naturally occurring,

While this process can be understood retrospectively, after a phenomenological analysis of the transcendence of prior knowledge, it necessarily happens moment to moment despite our conscious awareness of it or not. If we are to consciously apply our intentional gaze towards progressing through contradictory knowledge, it only seeks to erode the dissonance. In this way, philosophical understanding can develop through a dialectical system of thesis antithesis synthesis. In general, the philosopher should never stop the conversation within oneself, never settle on an ideology, or think that one has the whole picture. This mode of maintaining one’s own fallibility naturally encourages the Hegelian dialectical movement, which, apart from happening subconsciously, we can utilize in our ability to formulate higher order truths towards the containment of seemingly contradictory truths, that is, as long as we abstain from certainty in regards to any one idea.

Heideggerian Overview, Personal Interpretation, and Terminology

Originally Written: May 18th 2019

Heidegger set out to question what it means to “be”, what it means to be a Being, and what constitutes such a phenomenon. He took his approach phenomenologically, meaning from the approach of analyzing one’s own being, in what is commonly referred to as a subjective approach, analyzing phenomena as they appear within one’s own experience. He took this method and applied it in a broad ontological manner to the question of what is Being. Heidegger stated that we must develop a deep understanding of what it means to Be, what our Being is, prior to any objective pursuit, such as science or other intellectual activities. This phenomenological analysis, which seeks to give description and insight into the nature of our experience, and how it comes to fruition, what characterizes it, is necessary something which is presupposed in any scientific endeavor, without being explicitly stated. By continuing to ask scientific questions, in pursuing technological advancement, without clarifying the subjective mode, and the perspective and characteristics of it, we necessarily are engaging with material from a foundation that is unexplored. Heidegger sought out to explore this foundation, that which is the essential characteristics of our Being, in order to shed light upon anything which proceeds from it, which is all of our subjective experience, which, in reality, is all that truly matters to us. Heidegger discovered that our Being, the one we have access too, the one closest to us – so to say, itself is best understood through the many modes which are available to it, in general, the Being that we are, is a Being for whom his own Being is a problem for it, which is, what he termed “Dasein” or in general, the human condition, a Human Being.

The modes of being can be characterized as having distinct characteristics, arising, and being modified, by situations, environment, history, the present. In short, our experience is tempered by temporality itself, by time. Building off of Heidegger insight, Merleau-Ponty pointed out that this very being is deeply entwined with our perspective, which is primordially grasped and develops the contents of experience as an aggregation through time. The perspective which directly intuits and filters content of sensory input, through a signification structure, or a value structure, necessarily determines which information is manifest in consciousness. The development of datum in accordance with our inbuilt value structure, and modifications to the value structure, both from intuited pre-conscious perspective data collection, and conscious direction, mutually influence each other and reinforce the content which is manifest in our actions and conscious experience in the present moment. Heidegger makes reference to the nature of our being that of contained the threefold tenses of time, bundled up in the present. The present experience is tempered by historicity, the past, and is an intuition, and potentiality, of the future, both past and future, showing their modifications and effect within the manifestation of the present moment’s contents, in short, our being is modified by the unity of time, containing within it the past, present, and future.

The past isn’t following behind us, or a property making up who we were. It isn’t behind us, it is with us, it necessarily is us. This is so due to the past actively manifesting the future through our Being which is located in the present. Our past is characterized by humans thrownness, by us being here, in those times and places, in which we were thrown into, in which we existed without placing ourselves there. We relate to our present by being in a mode where we attempt to make sense of the world, where we try to feel comfortable, in satisfying desires, in short, we wish to be “at home in the world” in the present. Towards the future we are living as a projection of ourselves, we relate to the future by imagining the goals and aims wish we wish to accomplish. Now necessarily our present moment relation to each of these is contained in the present. This threefold nature of temporality is bundled in the present, and while there is a unity of the three, in the present, we, in our directedness, relate to each one differently. It is part of a humans very Being not in the conventional sense that we are using lessons learned through retrospective analysis or acting on  habits formed in the past, but it is itself part of the becoming future, it is a functional perspective of making sense out of our being in describing our history as being us as we are, and even being within the present, as it not only causally produced this moment, but continues acting within every moment of being, in an abstract sense it is moved from implicit to Being to its truthful place implicitly located within the definition that we give Being.

Our fundamental mode of being, in general, is characterized by intentionality. This intentionality implies that consciousness is always directed towards something, or with an object, an idea, a thought, a Kantian “Idea”. In other words, our being is always in relation towards a content. Our conscious gaze is directed towards something, and that intentional directedness of consciousness, and the contents it points at, necessarily is predetermined by our value structure, or what Heidegger refers to as the nature of care. That which fills out conscious experience, is the product of inherited, nurtured, developed, perspectively tempered, systematically built up, content. This content which is the production of the filtration of the perspective system, based upon the significance, or sense of which we are in relation to content, and the hierarchy of importance discerned by our embodied Being, makes up that which influences our Being. Our conscious gaze, marked by the modification of temporality, directed by intentionality towards a content, is deciphered as containing content which we care about. In other words, we only pay attention to that which has been developed, systematically, by the entirety of our Being, as something that is important, as something significant, that has a sense, in which we “care” about. Our consciousness cannot be directed upon phenomena in experience that doesn’t matter to us. If we are conscious of it, it has presented itself as something with meaning which, in the present moment, is manifesting itself in certain significance, which is intuited an ingested by the perceptive system, displayed in conscious experience, and further modified by our conceptual linguistic system to be represented symbolically using language. Granted, this description isn’t necessarily all Heidegger, there is a lot of my personal connection between different phenomenological discoveries and their entwinement into a complete picture, but the discover of intentionality, and care, are fundamental to Heidegger, and displayed in this way, gives us an abstract description which is objectively true of our subjective experience, which, in short, is what phenomenology seeks to uncover to us.

Spatiality for a being such as we are, Dasien, is experienced not in the distantially of phenomena, but rather what is most proximally subject of our conscious awareness within the present moment. What is closest is not felt or seen or experienced as what is physically closest, but as that which is most ready to consciousness, as that which is occupying our present conscious state, or has the ability to be so. In this way London might be closer to the man who is contemplating England, than the shoes on his feet, phenomenologically speaking. We see our contact lenses before objects objectively speaking, but in analyzing our being and its relation to spatiality, we always see and experience entities farther away, and feel them as closer to our experience, than the glasses which we see, and objectively are much closer. This is what Heidegger means by the concept “closeness”.

Apart from the general characteristics which make up our Being, there are different modes of being, that are distinct and contain their own significations, apart from the generalized universal attributes described above. These different mode of beings are reflective of the way in which we inhabit the word, several of which, as described by Heidegger, I will out outline.

One such mode is what Heidegger refers to as ready-to-hand, indicating that being which we embody in relation to tools, or something which becomes an extension of our self, without much thought about it, the mode of being which pertains to me typing, is that the device I am using is ready to hand for me, I am not analyzing it’s being, nor questioning its composition, I am using it as equipment for a certain end, as an extension of myself. Its meaning as ready-to-hand is intrinsic in my relation to it as it fits into the broader structure of the purpose I have for it, for which I am directed. The object that is ready-to-hand is not a content which we are subjectively conscious of, or focused upon, it is like our shoes, we do not think about them while walking, yet they are ready at hand to us in relation to the action new have in “walking”. It is the primordial sense of the term, existing prior to any theorizing, and the object is seen in its significance towards us as something to achieve a theorized end.

The theorized end, or contemplated phenomena for which the ready-to-hand is applied, towards which the gaze of consciousness is intentionally directed upon, is the present-at-hand. The being of the object is in relation to us, and our perception of it is modified by the state it is in. When the state is something to be utilized, it is present at hand to us. When the state of the object is perceived in a fashion that it itself is the object of conscious intentionality, then it becomes present-at-hand, or that which is the intentional object of phenomenological experience. The ready-to-hand object itself goes relatively unnoticed, until it breaks, or becomes un-ready-to-hand, and it is recognized from the perspective of another type of being, where it presents itself as present-at-hand. Meaning, it no longer is a working tool for an end, but it itself has been made into an end, that must be fixed to continue what is meaningful work for me (which writing happens to be). This present-at-hand device now becomes analyzed and inspected as a problem, and the mode of being which grasps and experiences such a phenomenon is another state which us humans, Dasein, encounter. The intentionality of our being, that of the which we are directed towards, becomes the content which is present-at-hand within the moment, to us, subjectively. The “object” or Kantian “idea” is that towards which we are directed at, and is denoted by the term present-at-hand.

Present-at-hand and Ready-to-hand are what objects are in relation to our conscious perception of them, and are altered as the contents of consciousness are altered. An object that is, at one subject moment, being used towards an end, if phenomenologically analyzed (retrospectively) it would be admitted as being ready-to-hand for us in that moment. If the next moment, our conscious gaze becomes directed upon the object, and thus it becomes the direct object of our intentionality, it moves from ready-to-hand to present-at-hand, for us, in that moment.

The modes of being which are possible for us are large and range in uniqueness to a scale which is hardly possible to be enumerated, at least presently, but what we can realize is that a range of experiences, of modes of being, are available to us, and they change situationally, I believe, due to determinate causes, which we can also work to uncover, as well as work to develop the characteristics which enable certain modes of being which we care more about, to be more prevalent in our lives. Say the mode of being which strives to overcome something challenging to the entity, becomes appealing to Dasien due to its rewarding nature in overcoming. One can learn the prerequisites and the modes of being which lead to such further entailed modes, and by a greater understanding and ability to recognizing circumstances and situations as having a potential value of initiating said desirable mode of being, better produce them in their own experience.

Heidegger’s had a conception of Dasein being in a natural state of “guilt”. We are guilty due to our thrown projection into our existence. We exist due to our thrownness, we are thrown into the world, into our present moment. We didn’t choose existence, choose this moment, we didn’t create ourselves, but we find ourselves here. Thus, we are indebted, naturally, to existence itself, to the universe, for an existence unasked for, undeserved, unwarranted. Someone who is in debt is naturally guilty. Thus, we are always guilty. Not only are we guilty of contained something which we did not ask for, namely, our existence, our very Being, but we are guilty in not living up to the call of our conscience in acting authentically,we are always guilty due to not being what we have the potential for being. Heidegger notes in his Being and Time that, “when the call of conscience is understood, lostness in the “they” is revealed. Resoluteness brings Dasein back to its own most potentiality for being its Self. When one has an understanding Being-towards-death – towards death as one’s own most possibility – one’s potentiality-for-Being becomes authentic and wholly transparent.” As our nature has us constantly living in front of ourselves, striving to future possibilities, we never are what we are, we always are living in and for the future, projecting ourselves into it, and we are at fault for not Being this authenticity which we should be, ourselves. Most of the time we are consumed by the they-self, a product of being part of society, of the mass, of the crowd, which shapes us. We are guilty of not being our true selves, as that which stems from the inclination of our own individualized Being, but instead, is modified in accordance with the masses, and seeks to project a false version of ourselves, and thus is inauthentic, and thus guilty of deception. This guilt, coupled with a realization of our finitude, an “expecting” or anticipation of our own annihilation, death, can produce a somewhat original conception of morality, grounded from this guilt. This is comparable to the Buddhist notion of morality being founded upon moral guilt, and moral dread. Thus, we are punished for what our conscience shows us to be bad and are forewarned and enticed not to commit it again, in dread, out of fear for the same suffering we produced before. In this way, guilt, time, conscience, death, and our specific type of Being, Dasien, all are tied together to produce morality. This springs from a resoluteness, or steadfastness, not to act contrary to our authentic selves (uninfluenced by society / norms) (which itself must be influenced and dependent upon such prior influences) but nonetheless is ourselves, not our immersion in a hive mentality, but producing activity that is in reaction to our own developed conscience. This resoluteness, or the ability to heed the call of conscious, to recognize our temporality, both in time and the eventual end of our individual time, and act in a way that accords with our own conscience, is what produces morality. This is all possible due to Dasein’s essential foundational nature as “care”, or the ability to attach importance to phenomena, in the sense of concernful solicitude – valuing / judging.

The idea of being-with-others in the Hiedeggerian sense is a distinctively different state of Being than that of Being-alone, in a sense of your state of Being when other humans or even life forms enter your conscious experience through their being environmentally close (perceived in consciousness physically) as well as mentally close (perceived in consciousness as a mental manifestation). The radical change is immediately recognizable, and I will not go into the details or characteristics of such a change, just that it is manifest in a way many people don’t naturally recognize as a distinct state of Being, which we most of the time, every day, are in. Those who say they do not like being around other people, or don’t like being around a lot of people, really mean to say, they do not like their state of Being-with which is only manifest among others. It is not the others, but it is your own state of being-with which you may find to become uncomfortable if you have aggregated a personality trait of unsociability. It is a mode of yourself which you are not content with, not the imposition of outside forces upon you. The mode of Being-with-others is modified according to the environment, our developed perceptual response, and the individuals to whom are in our company. Only those that are consciously or perceptively intuited as being in our presence are included as causal factors towards the modification of our being, those that go unperceived, or those not in our immediate vicinity, are not causally related to our mode of being-with-others. The unperceived, or unintuited physical presence of another Being, if consciously gazed upon cognitively, in thought or in recollection, modified our being additionally, but is not included in the sense of this term as Heidegger poses it.

On Coping With Existential Guilt

Originally Written: April 11th 2019

How is one to escape from the suffering and consummation of one’s character inflicted by the memory and assimilation of one’s own historical malevolence and shortcomings? This question is not to be posed to those of perfect character, but being that such a thing doesn’t exist, except in the minds of the mentally diminished, we must admit of having been cursed with periods of retrospectively found evil volition, and later discovered inner peace. It need not be discussed as to the causality and manifestation of such periods, as the factors present in any individual’s life range from ignorance to misfortune, what must be addressed is how to deal with our consciousness once it is consumed by the memory of one’s own moral ineptitude, and character traits resulting from historical events which one desires to escape from.

There is an absurd feeling which emerges when one compares who one is today, with the person one was in the past, growing more absurd the bigger the gap in time.  New knowledge and wisdom has taken us to this place, recognizing the suffering produced in the present moment, the flaws in our current condition, and through understanding the conditionality of such a state, we choose to rebel against the state of affairs inflicted upon our experience of the present. We wish to escape the historical antecedents causing unrest within our conscious experience. But to escape the web of causality is a logical fallacy, and attempting to do so necessarily creates cognitive dissonance at the expense of the individual’s sanity. To escape the suffering caused as a result of moral shortcomings implies a purging of moral shame and moral dread from one’s experience. This means no longer feeling remorse for one’s malevolence, and no longer fearing the result of repeating or taking part in a future unholy endeavor. This attempt to escape ones suffering from historical causes appears to be an escape from conscience, which is far from the answer to our original question, being how to cope with the inevitable suffering of falling short of one’s present ideals.

It’s clear that any advancement in one’s personal morality, both practically and abstractly, can be seen as being a result of what in Buddhism is regarded as the twin foundation stones of morality, moral shame and dread. Feeling the pangs of one’s past transgressions, recognizing the current repercussions in one’s experience and the conscious experience of suffering due to such actions, forces one into the biologically necessary position of dreading such an experience in one’s future, aiding the development of a character aiming at avoiding said moral infringements to one’s system. Being that we are discussing a system of beliefs in the ethical sphere, it’s worth noting that such a conscience is in no way universal to all, but can be judged according to universal principles. This means we may not share the current conscience, view of good and evil, which doesn’t mean that the validity of such developed systems lies in the relativity of one’s society and culture, ultimately, only apparently does.

Sam Harris’s conceptualization of universal principles which encapsulates all of mankind moving in a positive direction towards a better humanity, and away from universal suffering, gives us a good description on the structure we should be using to judge the state of one’s conscience, or in comparing multiple individuals to one another and their relation to higher shades of meaning and moral recognition. But here I digress only to state that what we are concerned with is the individual, and not the validity of his conscience, which should be analyzed and constructed through the accumulation of experience and wisdom requisite to be a man wishing to rectify his current experience with past malevolence. Thus one is necessarily in the correct state of mind to answer and proceed such inquires if he reaches the point in life where he poses the question, and sees finding its solution necessary, for the good of one’s own experience foremost, with a thought towards its influence on humanity at large.

What the courageous man wishes to embark on, is a rebellion against the constraint on one’s character and psyche imposed by a literally different person, oneself, in one’s past. The difference in the two people need not be noted, separated by time, one creates and destroys, changes, and evolves, in directions only recognized as positive or negative due to comparison in phenomenological data and subjective judgment, and this process of transfiguring is proceeding to be carried out from moment to moment. Thus one rebels against the human condition, against that absurd contradiction not between the outside world and the inside world, but between ones perceived past and ones perceived present, between what was, what is, and what could be, between the contradiction herein, and the immediately illusory belief that the same person is inhabiting all three positions.

The unrelenting drive of the psyche to push one’s consciousness to accept the validity of one’s own ability to volitionally act outside of the bounds of causality, free will, as well as believe in the permanence of a central Being (a self), serves to undermine reality, necessarily creating an absurd view of the state of our being as we perceive it. Those who have struggled to emerge from such illusions here should consider themselves blessed, as one obstacle in our pursuit is no longer an issue. The proof of such phenomena being falsehoods, is expanded upon in “The Causal Tethers Which Bind Us”. Seeing ones past as a series of acts done by another person (a previous version of the current “self”) doesn’t aide the individual upon first glance as we perceive ourselves as constant through time (albeit – an illusory view), but one should rebel against the nature of the mind to see oneself in this way to attempt to cut through the illusion, if not experientially at least abstractly. While it is necessary to experience the moral shame and dread proceeding an unjust act, as it is a necessary place in psychic growth and wisdom in producing a mind better able to act in accordance with itself, we must not allow ourselves to act from the habits formed by someone who lives in a distinctly different time in place. Rather, we should rebel against the strings which move us, and attempt to cut our ties to the character traits we consciously wish to separate ourselves from. Our suffering acts as an indicator of where to approach, where to learn, where to grow, and we should follow it, and when based on misfortune, accept it stoically, when based on our own acts, rebel.

Fight against the tendency to continue in darkness, fight against the stagnation of unrelenting conscious stability, fight for a better experience, a better life, a better humanity. We must accept that we deserve our punishment which we created for ourselves, and in rebelling against the idea that we still are the person we used to be, we become the person we have the potentiality of being. Rebel against any tendency towards a rigid conception of eternal permanence. Whether we find ourselves suffering for the misfortune of a past, or of an act of immortality sparked by the cursed nature which we inherited, whether through ignorance or awareness of rage, the suffering which we currently experience must be fought off with the aim of creating the space for the new to replace the old. The mind is consciously attempting to manifest order to combat the chaos of past experience, we must not hinder it by further pursuing dissonant thoughts, or acting in accordance with our outdated philosophy. We should strive to build upon the biological framework, the universal scaffolding, which we encounter within the present moment. To tear down the edifice, to cause a revolution of the spirit, to attempt to escape the causes which fabricates the present, is a dissociative endeavor, causing only future confusion and voluntary ignorance. Through denial of past events we serve only to fool ourselves into insanity, to accept the occurrence of the past, and work to overcome its negative effect on the present, is the task of the brave.

We must bridge the gap between the unchanging past and the changing present, and see that it is possible to accept the validity of both, while transcending them both to a higher level of conceptualization, and from there incorporate the truths we have thus far encountered.  To escape one’s history is never the goal, to overcome misfortune and the evil discovered in one’s own heart is the task at hand.  The emergence of the realization of one’s own malevolence is unearthed only through conscious retrospection, and is only conquered through conscious pursuit of a character in accordance with ones developed conscience. Effects of one’s own evil manifestations, such as those upon our character, and those which are experiential, such as memories, are overcome psychologically through rebelling against the principles one once stood upon, through fighting against our nature to habitually indulge in bad intentions, through pursuing a morality based on the lessons one has acquired, which is constituted by a factual interpretation of reality. Historical rebellion is combated by rebelling against the restraints, the universe which holds us attached to it.

We should fight against our biological drive to see ourselves as being the same as our experiences, and rather frame the situation realistically, in us constituting the current production of history. One should strive to extract the gold in the lessons we’ve learned while simultaneously avoiding over encumbrance by the content of memories.

We recognize the outdated version as being us, yet distinctly different, thus in our comparison we conclude the situation is patently absurd. In addition to us never being able to truly know who we are now, or understand the totality of past states of being which make up the foreground of our present experience, there is the fact of other individuals having even more ignorance of our historical being. The separation we feel within, between our old self and new self, our recognition of ignorance, coupled with the isolation we feel in reference to others, undoubtedly creates an absurd mindset. Not to mention, if this line of thought is carried out, we realize our ignorance of others to be incalculably greater than the ignorance of ourselves, which if honestly admitted, is unbearably large as it is. This puts us in a strange place mentally, but not necessarily in a situation without hope, and not within a challenge too great to not be worth rebelling against, and overcoming through wisdom itself, aided by reason, virtue, discipline, and persistence.

We ought to rebel against the constraints of determinism in confining you to a predestined path by conscious effort towards escaping the confines consciously imposed through recollection of your past character, and instead pursue the character, state of being, place in reality, which you desire and claim to be better. Do not let the chains of your past hold you down, even though they literally do, even if we know that we are permanently chained through causality, that does not mean to give up on a path to greater heights than we have experienced, nor to sacrifice our thoughts and actions toward goals we set, but rather we should accept our condition in history, and fight against our inner demons urging us to immorality or to the ruin of our current condition through complacency.

Criticism of Absurdism and how to Escape The Absurd

Originally Written: March 24th 2019

The error with duality, and with certain philosophies, specifically absurdism, is the fundamental claim that humans are somehow distinct and separate from the universe. To distinguish man, and the universe outside man, as two separate groups, conceptually, is useful and descriptive of a real situation, but it doesn’t mean that it accurately reflects a reality outside of our conceptual usage, to which, such distinction does “truly” exist. The trouble comes in making exclusionary claims about either two of the groups without depicting the role the opposite has in its functions. This distinction causes us to have a gap between the two concepts that is larger than it actually is, and is ignorant to the inclusion of man within the bounds of the universe, and the presence of the universe in man’s reality. We are most obviously rudimentary aspects of the universe, neither divine nor lowly, yet part of the whole. To distinguish the universe from ourselves is to leave out an integral part, it’s literally separating advanced biochemistry from reality as if it’s not part of the picture. Its saying that the teachings of physics don’t exist, it’s making a claim which doesn’t match up to established scientific truths and observational data.

Does it matter, to a human, if the outside universe is meaningless, when the human, himself, has found meaning or has the possibility of discovering meaning within the universe? It becomes irrelevant of the universe without him in it, as he surely is in it. Thus the distinction of absurdity in comparing the two is valid if recognizing that certain people are searching without finding, thus it is just a matter of them not looking hard enough, but it is not absurd for anyone who has discovered, or seen manifest in his consciousness, or who merely isn’t ignorant of his will to live, of a meaning within the individual’s life. The nihilist in the room is ignorant, easily cured by knowledge, introspection, abstraction, a leap of faith, or a change of perception. A pointed awareness toward the epiphenomenon of our own biology and will to live gives ground to sufficiently explaining at least one value system inherit within us.

Is it possible to escape the absurd through realizing truly real meaning in the universe? Perhaps it is not the contradiction between the humans seeking meaning and the nature of a meaningless universe that is absurd, perhaps the absurd is in the ignorance of our own selves being part of that very universe, and there being a meaningful path engraved into us biologically, paradoxically, or perhaps not so, created by this universe. Thus, if we are part of the universe, and there is a meaningful path to be taken through the passage of time that means something, perhaps only to humans or sentient beings, and morality truly exists in this sphere, without committing philosophical or physical suicide, we have stumbled onto a 4th solution that lies outside of the question. There isn’t any higher transcendental place to find the answers which we seek as most existentialist claim as they take leaps of faith. Nor is the absurd predicament a true predicament. But the universe itself holds meaning in the very fabric that gave rise to us humans. While we don’t matter to any other aspect of reality, the aspect of reality we do matter to is ourselves – and each other. Any being that can have a better or worse experience finds significant meaning within that experience, things matter to it, insofar as they have an effect on subjective experience.

Could this be the fundamental claim on which absurdism is broken? That the philosopher who compares the universe with the human, fails to recognize that the human, being a part of the universe, is in himself as much the universe itself as is anything else that is real. Thus, claiming the absurd arises when there is a human and there is a world, a world which is irrational and meaningless and a human which is rational, seeking meaning, rests on false promises, if that human has meaning within himself and which his seeking is able to find. This absolves the solutions of necessarily committing philosophical suicide, as nothing transcendental or supernatural is conceded. It is merely within the organization of one’s own consciousness that one discovers that there is meaning, it’s in one’s intentionality of our Being. Meaning, value, purpose, drives us through our desires and anticipations, our anxieties and our aims, it courses through our blood every moment of everyday, it drives us to continue living, and not only merely to survive, but to survive in a way which is optimal for us experientially. Our own subjective experience, our unconscious accumulation, our biological perceptivity, is all mediated with a purpose, it is transfused with meaning, whether we can conceptually admit to it or not. Our interpersonal relationships exist in a mode of being which is directed with meaning, it isn’t for no reason that we act the way we do, moment to moment.

The principle of sufficient reason applies to all phenomena, and that principle applied to our totality of being can reveal to us the value structure we contain, toward which we consciously and environmentally we modify, and pursue life through that modified mode of being as depicted in its total process in “Value System Instantiation”. Setting an aim to pursue, that aim being ours, and us being part of the universe which is “meaningless” (in its entirety, but not in its parts, obviously), gives us the fulfillment and purpose we have been searching for. We find meaning in the product of our actions, in consciousness intentionally directed, moment to moment, in alignment with a value structure (conscious or unconscious) – manifest in one’s relationships, in life, in experience, in subjectivity, which is part of this universe, not outside it nor transcending it, not more important than any other aspect of it, just part of it. 

Albert Camus committed the universal danger of intellectual folly in pursuing absurdism with the either voluntary ignorance in the above information, or the omission of such information in his philosophical works. While his framework from absurdism, and the conclusions of rebellion and his answer to the “absurd” conundrum is all coherent and of a rationally unique philosophic spectrum, he commits the sin of omission, or ignorance, in regard to articulating the full picture in which we find ourselves. It is a great danger to any person who is brighter than normal, intellectually gifted, or extensively educated to use the enhanced power of critical thinking, reasoning, and logical coherence down a path with unstable roots, producing a product, a work of abstract conceptual explanation that is through and through coherent and revelatory, yet built on sand rather than bedrock. Thus the transient obsession of the intellect can lead one to profound experiences and insights along a path that veers away from concrete reality, beautifully explaining and rationalizing the journey in a way captivating to the intellect, yet unable to visualize one’s own digression away from truth. As the intellectually powerful yet deceived man continues an abstract journey down metaphysical pathways, explaining and rationalizing aspects of such a revelatory perception, abstracting and logically tying ethics or ontology or psychology into the mix and supporting claims with proofs and valid evidence, he invests more and more of his conscious attention, time and energy on the exposition of such realms, captivating audiences, yet, the great danger presents itself when discovered by a random onlooker. The beautiful construction was built from cards, on a bed of water, and elucidates an entire reality on which we are not part of, which doesn’t match up to the one in which we find ourselves. People have done this with religions, governments, philosophical concepts such as free will, self-hood, the list goes on and on, and the rabbit hole proceeds from false axioms. Perhaps the foundational claims or interests which springboard the philosophy into the genius’s production are based on premises that are falsifiable, perhaps the interest and discoveries prove truly unuseful, unmeaningful, to anyone except the dedicated expositor, perhaps the system is coherent if the laws of physics were different, if reality itself revealed itself through concrete evidence to contain the cornerstones of which the intellectual built off of. Yet reality doesn’t always contain that stone, and thus the exposition becomes a sham, and a convincing sham at that. Thus the danger of the intellectual, that he should lead his life in using his powers to discover nothing of value, nothing of meaning, and to falsely believe so. Thus, one should be grounded and fire a thousand bullets from every angle into any premise in which one desires to proceed from, and the analysis and criticism of one’s values should be in the periodical checklist of the person’s consciousness, to avoid pursuit down such paths, and to greater clarify and point one’s direction.

Camus’ solution to the absurd in accepting a transitory meaning without philosophically forgetting our absurd position in the universe, smiling though accepting a meaningless fate, is thus discredited if the universe is framed differently as I have just shown. It’s not necessarily wrong, it’s just not a complete picture, it is omitting an important distinction, and caveat, to the distinction made between man and the world. Framing the universe as meaningless, is a false method of framing it, as there is meaning in life which is in the universe, which makes the inclination behind the premise lead to false conclusions. Of course the whole is different than the sum of the parts, but if a part has meaning, is made of meaning, is oriented and navigates experience based on meaning, then the whole necessarily contains meaning, albeit it may solely be one part of its totality. If we say, what is the meaning of the universe? For what purpose does the universe exist? The question makes no sense, as the arbitrary category includes literally everything, the only response would be to say it exists for the purpose of Being, so that its contents can exist, the totality exists for the purpose of supporting all existence (God?), as that naturally is what we see the contents of the universe doing, existing. If we make the clearer significant distinction, what is the meaning the universe has for us? For what purpose is our individual existence existing within the totality of existing things, “the universe”? Towards what end ought we pursue within this universe we find ourselves “thrown” into? That question itself is also slightly misleading, as shown above, we already have meaning which is driving us through every moment, we have genetically coded, biologically modified, culturally and environmentally shaped, desires and conscious experience which strive to achieve satisfaction of momentarily dissatisfaction. We can easily tell moment to moment what we want, and this desire stems from an evaluation of who we have the potential to be, or what we could potentially have. It is in this constant pursuit of the future that we uncover what we value, it is in pursuing what we value that we find the meaning the “universe” has for us, we find the fulfillment and the purpose for which we strive to conceptualize in the revealing of our value structures and the pursuit of that which is important to us, that which our care is directed towards. For more information on the topic: (It’s A Wild World, The Answer to the Absurd Conundrum).

Value System Instantiation, Meaning Pursuance, and Progress through Overcoming Difficulty

Originally Written: March 12 2019

Part of the fundamental problem we have as biological beings is the gap between our values and the production of meaningful solutions to the novel situations which we encounter. We know what actions are “good” yet the situations we encounter are difficult to discern as to what constitutes the optimal pathway for us to take. Our general mode of being and manner of operating in the world is dependent upon schemas of action that are responsive (adequately or not) to the multitude of situations we encounter in our environment. These situations elicit the manifestation of a schema through our assimilating the situation to the schema, and given that each situation (each present moment) is novel, we then have to accommodate that assimilated schema to meet up with reality in a manner that works for us. If we can intelligently adapt to novel situations, our schema likewise undergoes a modification that can adequately meet the challenge of the moment. Often times these schemas, which are always significant and hold our developed values in them, aren’t adequate, and for those situations, we have the ability to consciously manifest our values, in accordance with what we know, towards the production of a viable solution. In this manner we move through successive steps, albeit miniscule ones, in the manner Jean Piaget describes as genetic epistemological advancement. It is only when we reach an equilibrium between the assimilating and accommodating functions that our operations are adequately able to intelligently adapt to novel situations. This, as a requisite, is dependent on fleshing out the value structure that makes up the framework of the actions that are schematized.

Arising of the Existential question

Existential inquiry arises in every individual once he reaches the intellectual stage of being able to abstractly contemplate the nature of his own Being. This, for most people, begins at around the age of 12-14, and continues throughout life, constantly resurfacing. With the emergence of the problem of our own Being, and our place in the world, we seek for answers. We can find many of these answers in our values, which dictate those schemas which orient us in the world, and can prove of being better or worse at providing the fulfillment we strive after in life. The more effort, time, structure, discipline, and intellect one commits to the organization of one’s life towards a meaningful path will determine the amount of progress he is able to achieve in pursuit of the things he values, and the wellbeing extracted from such pursuits. Environmental factors, genetic disposition, culture, society, education, character disposition, all are relevant factors which contribute to the individual’s pursuit of meaning, and the amount of progress he is able to make.

Necessity of philosophy in evaluation

As always, we must live first, then philosophize. But in order to maximize our potential, in the directions we desire, we must philosophize, and we all do this, to a lesser or greater degree, whether it’s made explicit and regarded as such or not. Not only do we all philosophize, we can be better or worse at doing so, and the results of our philosophy are fleshed out in the experience of our lives, in the manner we live, in our subjective experience, in our relationships, and in how we tackle the present moments arising. We must seek to orient ourselves around a value system which can lead to the most desirable future, implying and necessitating an articulate defining, organizing, and implementing of actions in alignment with what we believe to be most important. Our time management and effort must be in accordance with the system of significance we place upon the values, rather than allowing ourselves to be carried along by the river of desire without receiving the potential wellbeing available to us through psychological integration and meaning optimization.  While many values are inherent, those which we most seek to manifest oftentimes succumb to the temptations of others, unconsciously. The goal here is to philosophically uncover, organize, and optimize our lives towards the pursuance of a more meaningful life.

If Value’s Aren’t Regulated

If our value system goes unregulated, and we remain unaware of its effect on our lives, we run the risk of our lives being hijacked by things which serve to promote societal and biological desires, rather than the individualized desire which fulfills us. The assent to values which are of less importance and significance than those which we consciously can uncover as promoting wellbeing and providing meaning is the error we wish to correct for, for the benefit of our own psyche, and everyone else in our expanding circle of influence.

Given the potentiality of ideological possession, and the ever growing instantiation of ethics corrupting societally provided value structures, and the cultural importance placed upon material gain, our value system is becoming more vulnerable to the effects of powers outside our control, and less effective in providing the meaningful basis for a competent, efficient, creative, and fulfillment providing life. The question we must ask is whether we want our lives to be ruled by tyranny, do we want to be the slaves to our society and to our biology, or do we want to impose our will upon the content of our own lives, and by recognizing and optimizing the content herein, form a life which represents who we truly have the potential to be? Do we want to fulfill the potential we contain at being a competent, moral, beneficial human, or do we want to be swept along on the waves of misfortune produced by external and biological influences?

Conservation of the old

We should seek orientation of that which is available rather than throwing out the old system in its entirety, this problem of shedding off the traditional spiritual underpinnings was stated by Nietzsche as that which led to the nihilism and evil present in the 20th century after the scientific worldview become dominant and, in a causal sense, necessitated the potentiality of the “Death of God”. Novel explanatory conceptualizations of values aren’t impossible, just as novel “creations” aren’t impossible in any other domain, we just have to recognize that as with anything, the new necessarily contains the old, it stems out of it, in evolution and in technology, in morality and in science. The causal link between the datum of experience and potential values we have at our disposal is a link that cannot be sundered. As the value structure necessarily gives rise to what we place an importance on and what we pursue, it is an integral process of the mode of being which underlies all manifestations in our actions and experience.

Bottom Up Understanding of the Value System

One must first identify their value structure as it is built up biologically, in its embodied form, and secondly, in the conscious articulation of how it manifests itself consciously. We have an embodied perceptive system, that is built up from our genetic material upon conception. This perception seeks, from the first moments of an organism’s life, to “digest” and “filter” incoming datum through sensory receptors, which is mediated based upon, in the first case, genetic instruction. The schematic underpinnings that dictate our ability to do so, are encoded with reflexive abilities, and have the “ability” to perceive with the “meaning” of it being valuable to the continuation of the genetic material that instantiated it.

The perceptive ability of our Being is in itself our initial evaluation system, it discerns content in relation to the significance it has to us, and directs our nervous system towards mitigating and responding to stimuli, both external and internal. Two separate mechanisms take place in this initial evaluation of stimuli, on the one hand, our perceptive system is oriented around discerning content in our perceptible environment that has significance for us, which is one manner of saying that everything “naturally” has value to us. If things didn’t have value to us, we wouldn’t focus on them, and content wouldn’t ever be discerned and arise in consciousness. On the other hand, that very perception which selects significant content in our environment for filtration occurs based on our own perceptive systems modification by our value structure.

The system of perception is modified in infanthood, and onward, through its environment, and the causal nature of that which is available to influence us. That which is available to be perceived, is filtered by what the biological system believes would be most optimal to the propagation of the genome, which is the starting point of our values, and generally what they are “subservient” to. Such imperatives hold background significance throughout life. While this is the groundwork of evaluation, in biological imperatives that imply the continuation of the survival machine towards puberty in which the organism can propagate the genetic material, the value and method towards which it achieves inbuilt biological aims is modified by the cultural, environmental, and interpersonal relations of the individual. These effects modify the value structure which modifies perceptions towards that which is useful to react to, and in such reactions, optimize the “wellbeing” or “beneficiality” of response in regard to novel situations.  The biological system that is modified through life in filtrating perceptive data, is integrally tied up with our conscious experience, and its contents enter consciousness.

As we biologically intuit datum which sensory receptors “discriminate” as being useful to perceive, so too does our Being intuit which perceptions arise into conscious awareness, based on the same desire and imperatives which run towards the optimality of the organism. The contents of consciousness are in alignment with these desires, as they are modified by the environment and totality of our Being in relation to what the individual comes to understand, and believe, and intuit, or know, is the optimal aim towards which to guide himself. Whether or not it actually is, is irrelevant. What matters is that one’s values, regardless of conscious recognition or not, guide the individual’s moment to moment conscious experience, as well as his bodily reciprocity to the situation one finds oneself in in the moment. We always are operating under this basic low resolution conception of the value system, arising from the bottom up, from perception to consciousness.

Top Down Directing the Value System

Every moment is necessarily supported by an inherent biological value system, and the contents of consciousness as well as our embodied reaction to the moment are products of it. While the bottom up description explains the initial instantiation of our value system, it does little to aide us from where we’re at in top down influence. We ought to be able to give assent to our values consciously, and consciously direct ourselves towards values and aims which are our own authentic expression. What is important to you? What currently is taking up your time, mental space, and what are you currently actively pursuing? The answers to these questions may never have been made conscious, or we might not know exactly where they currently are at.

There is a concrete difference between what one’s actions show to be valuable to the individual, and what one believes to be valuable. Firstly, we wish to analyze what actually composes the individual’s life, and how it compares to what ought to compose the individual’s life. We must take an honest account of our time, and an honest account of our beliefs about what we desire to be doing, who we desire to be, where in our career we desire to be, where in our environment we desire to be, what kind of skills we wish to improve, what knowledge we would like to obtain, what character traits we would like to embody, and what psychological state we would like to have. In answering these questions as to where we currently are, we can find answers to what our unconsciously acted out belief system denotes as being our current value structure. In answering these questions as to where we would like to be, we can define what our consciously formulated value structure actually is. The gap between what is manifesting as an inherent value pursuit, and what we actually value will determine the difficulty in aligning the two. The goal, broadly speaking, is to bring the two into alignment so that our actions and time spent represents what our consciously formulated value structure is. In uncovering what is important to us, we can create a list of things we value, and in their evaluation, to the best of our ability, discover what it is that would provide us meaning.

Purpose of Uncovering Values

We must seek to uncover the values inherent in our deterministic biological nature, and in discovering their potentialities, consciously decide which we wish to embody and to which degree we wish to pursue their manifestation. The “creation” of values is necessarily a pursuit which is only possible with the addition of experience, and in fact, isn’t actually a creation. It is more a development, a modification, of inherent values imposed upon us through genetic and environmental influences. As far as our values as we find them in the moment, none can be created, but they can be altered through conscious direction towards novel experiences (all experiences). The prioritization, embodiment in actualization, and modification of what we value can be consciously directed. The derivation of meaning and importance allocated to the potentiality of value is what is “in our control”. While the values themselves are inherent, their discovery, and the systematic recalibrating of our actions and Being in alignment with them, or to modify them, is something possible to be directed consciously. The expansion of knowledge and experience exposes us to novel situations, of which we always are judging, and placing a value of importance on. This content of experience is the datum from which we have to work with in informing how to hierarchical order our values. We cannot value that which we do not know, or what hasn’t been integrated into our psyche as something holding value. This process ought to be done in a way which is optimal for you, and everyone else, now, and across time. The optimization process must be recalibrated as additional knowledge and insight into circumstantial navigation and our own nature become uncovered to us. As long as the value is in line with what is important to you, consciously, and is an accurate representation of that importance, then we can continue.

What Matters in Uncovering Our Current Value System

We necessarily find more meaning in the pursuit and attainment of the things which we consciously formulate as being of value rather than in the things which we unconsciously carry out in our daily lives (which still contain meaning and value, but they ought to become subservient to the higher goal)The reward system which manifests itself in pleasure and pride can aide the individual in determining if something is meaningful to them. If you gain a specific type of knowledge, create a specific type of art, make progress in a certain direction, and it feels good to do so, if it fills you with a sense of accomplishment, if it moves your psychological state to one of fulfillment, then it is being flagged through the reward system indicators that it is meaningful to you. That being said, every reward system flooding of the subjective experience doesn’t mean that it is a noble or consciously confirmed meaningful act, it merely can be analyzed in order to determine what consciously can be connected to something you value. If you find pleasure in food, sex, and alcohol, and the reward system floods you with a positive emotion which seeks to reinforce those stimuli, you must consciously analyze if they are in line with your value structure, if not, then they are not to be pursued in a goal oriented fashion towards the goal of a meaningful life.

If the activity is retrospectively analyzed as producing a fulfilling mode of being, as well as being in line with the consciously formulated conception of what your value system ought to be, then you can take that as datum towards something which provides meaning, and can be pursued in a goal oriented way. Pleasure and pain in this regard must be analyzed, in short, with discernment, in determining their potential for long term benefit, as well as to their usefulness and potential benefit for you, the people you care about, and the outward circles of influence with which we all are engrossed in (the chain of causality as it applies to relationships between sentient beings). This extrapolation and analysis can be carried out to a larger or shorter extent, but what is necessary before continuing on is that a number of values must be defined, even if it is rudimentary.

Prioritization Of Values

Once we have a list of values, we must hierarchically organize them in order of importance. This organization is predicated based on what we would spend the most time doing, and what would take precedence over the others in terms of effort. While philosophical articulation and elucidation may be high on my list, it always is superseded by people, in terms of family, friendships, coworkers, and any other human who needs help. In this manner, I’ve consciously chosen the value of compassion for people to supersede my most vehement interests. In this way we must organize our value system, in a way that is practical so as to be employable in our actual lives. The establishment of a hierarchy of values is crucial in future planning for how to organize time, and how to maximize the meaning and wellbeing provided to us by pursuing the values (and their distribution across our days/ lives).

Example of Value System Prioritization

The natural inclination toward hedonistic pursuits may result in overindulgence and a large amount of time loss as well as a decline in health. We may consciously and verbally state that we have a desire and find meaning in philosophical knowledge acquisition, in truth seeking and mental exploration, the pursuit of which would better serve to provide meaning in our lives than that sensual drive which could dominate the psyche. The value of power and dominance may fill the opportunity cost of pursuing competency in a skill we value. We find that our current value structure, that which is ingrained in us through society and our biology, doesn’t always serve to provide the meaning and wellbeing which we have the potential of attaining. We pursue what is less meaningful at the peril of our consciously formulated abstract belief system. We still may value the objects of sensual pleasure, and we can allocate appropriate time in their pursual and enjoyment, as well as continue to value ambition in our careers leading to a rise in our place in the dominance hierarchy, but the differentiation of the values, and assigning an appropriate role to them in our lives is here the mission.

Planning Value Pursuance

With the hierarchical organization of our values in place firmly, yet remaining open to further modification, we can then work out the envisioning of what their carrying out would look like. This is a contemplative visualization of what the embodiment, improvement, or attainment of our values ought to look like. With this in mind, we are better equipped to work towards something, and are able to consciously adapt our mode of being so as to be in line with what that visualized image appears to us to be.

Based on our contemplative image of what the embodiment of our values is, we can plan benchmark goals toward their attainment. These can be concrete material or temporal milestones, or abstract urgencies in which we seek to embody. These goals and aspirations we can separate between benchmark placeholders towards the attainment of a meta-goal, or simply as guidelines in which to follow in the progression towards the attainment of more concrete goals. This applies to character traits, virtue embodiment, career trajectory, familial planning, etc.

Habitualizing Values

We can use our ability to consciously direct ourselves to promote the advancement of values, in the form of reinforcing the actions and thoughts, the phenomena which, as manifestations of underlying modes of being, can be used in a reflexive manner to promote the underlying value. The habitualization is necessary to conscious value instantiation and reinforcement, and thus the transmogrification of our value system to that which we consciously assent to. Habitualization to those consciously assented to values has the negative tendency of reducing values which we consciously perceive as less significant, as less time and concentration is allocated to them, as certain things become more prominent in our lives, others become less. Discipline and conscious direction are used, and in turn, also gain from the positive feedback loop of their increased actualization. This adds to the advancement of our ability to consciously direct our experience toward such experiences which are more meaningful. Of course habitualization, whether consciously or not, is often enacted for other aims, and in pursuit of values which we may mistakenly lend our assent to. Experiential wisdom and conscious attentiveness to the process of change in our values and the mode of being which embodies it will serve to inform the individual whether he is on the right path or not.

The Navigation Problem

We ought to have an established image in mind of a future reality with which we look to pursue, which is in line with our hierarchically organized value system while systematically having definite goals in which to pursue towards the embodiment those values. We can then analyze how best to navigate our lives in the direction of the established system. This implies time management, dedication, distraction and entertainment reduction, effort and discipline. Morality comes into question here, and our morals, like everything else we do, will dictate our experience of life and our effect upon the world. Every decision we make can be better or worse at being “good”, if we take for our standard of “bad” the worst possible state of suffering for everyone, as Sam Harris explains in his novel the Moral landscape. In operating from a moral realist meta-ethical perspective, we hold that our actions can move the dial in one of two directions, and since we find value in our subjective experience, and presumably of those we love, those we come into contact with, and in extreme cases, all humans or sentient beings, it is essential that our morals stem from our consciously deduced evaluation system. As for a minor-ethical theory that is optimal to follow, we find that “Wisdom Ethics”, or moral particularism, is the only system that can account for the vast landscape we encounter in novel situations.  Moral dread and guilt are our guide here, and our value system ought to be optimized to account for the effects our actions have on others, as it does more than impact their wellbeing, but has rational self-interested implications as well.

Moral Shame and Dread

A sense of moral shame, and moral dread, are the twin pillars in Buddhism of morality, and we can apply the concepts to shame and dread in the face of deviation from what is meaningful, so as to fuel us in the right direction. The negative emotion experienced in deviating from the optimal path we have outlined, denotes a flaw in our discipline and drive towards what is meaningful. This shame can be recalled, and transformed into a reminder of what it feels like to experience such negative self-image, and allows us to dread its reoccurrence in the future. In this way we can systematically forge our trait of discipline to be fueled by the negative reinforcing attribute of suffering when deviation occurs. In addition, the reward mechanism in pursuance of our values can be altered and consciously recognized so as to be inspiration for future discipline reinforcement, of a positive kind.

Structuring Time

How we spend our time, and the quality of that time spent, will be an integral factor towards our individual trajectory towards our goals. We can retrospectively analyze our current time usage, on a day by day, or weekly basis, in order to see which areas need to be modified, and which can altogether be cut out, reduced, or changed, to be in line with our newly established value system. The analysis of the current system and formulation of the ideal system will aide us in disciplining ourselves towards a pragmatic pathway and daily framework in which to pursue our values. While rigid order and structure of such a sort can be overwhelming and stagnating to the individual, as stated by an ancient philosopher, live first, then philosophize, we can find a medium between organizing the chaos, as well as instantiating novel conceptions towards the system we established. The discipline it takes to create a structured day, allows us the freedom to pursue what we value. Far from being rigid and entrapping of the individual, such a structured and analyzed time management plan actually enables the individual to cut out periods of the day in which he was pursuing things which he doesn’t value as highly as others and in turn replace them with things he values more.

Now such definite daily scheduling can be done to varying degrees, and is always open to re-evaluation, and to alteration by the ever spontaneously arising trials which we encounter on a regular basis. The general planning of how best we ought to manage our time gives us an idea of how we should spend the day for it to be optimal, the broadness of categories, and the designation in the day for ulterior pursuits, all can be part of the “plan”. An ulterior mode of pursuing goals and of planning for the journey to meaning can be used in a more practical prioritizing method, rather than on a concrete schedule. For example, a time expenditure modeled can be based on prioritizing interests in the hierarchically organized value system, so that each node gets touched upon at least for a short time in the day. Higher values in the system would take precedence over lower ones, and more time would be spent engaging in them. If I was engaged in progressing a lower value in the system, and some insight or issue or object which needs attention arises which is categorized in to a higher value on my list, then I would sacrifice the time in the lower for the higher.

The use of wisdom and insight into the pragmatic actualization of time management allows us to navigate how, and when, we should sacrifice values for each other, and in the ways in which we can compensate for the rectifying of time loss in a certain pursuant. Our moral system combined with the value system, combined with practical wisdom, experiential data, all are important factors towards the prioritizing of our values and the plan or framework we devise in the planning of the journey to a meaningful life. If a meaningful, fulfilling life, one of psychological wellbeing, pride in accomplishment, and beneficiality of our deeds to our own mode of being as well as to those we value, is something important to you, then the difficulty and time spent in creating an optimal path, the discipline required to stay on track, and the suffering inherent in the sacrifice of lesser values for higher values, will be surely worth it.

Instantiating a Consciously Formulated Value System

We can to a greater or lesser degree forge an abstract conception of what an optimal solution to the embodiment of our values are. The pursuing and embodying our value structure in our daily lives is meaningful in itself. The path is itself fulfilling as we are spending time and effort towards that which we most value. As a caveat, the discovery of values, creation of a list which accurately represents our optimal mode of being, and the organization of time and effort, is a difficult process, but when the groundwork is laid, and the pursuit becomes habitualized, the wellbeing supplied by such a process is worth the strain. What is a better way to live, than the way you consciously decide is the best way to live? Necessary to the continued progression in the direction of your values is the constant recalibration, updating, and optimization of the path as well as the goals.

Preservation of Value

As we spend time in embodying our value system, in instantiating it into our daily lives, in pursuing what is meaningful, we necessarily gain experiential data and feedback from the real world which we can use to modify the entire system. This is a constant process, as we gain experience, we gain in wisdom, as we gain in wisdom, how we navigate our lives, and the structure with which we abstractly create in which to navigate it, all are modified and can be improved. We should be disciplined, yet hold ourselves and our plans as fallible, we must remain determined, yet simultaneously never hold ourselves to be infallible. What we pursue, the method we use to pursue it, the knowledge gained and the application of that knowledge, must be constantly evolving, in order to better serve our wellbeing and better represent our true values. The abstract ideal values we contemplate often don’t serve the pragmatic utility we gauged them to, and the plans we make always will encounter room for optimization. This recalibration process is something the individual unconsciously undergoes as he moves through life, but here, being as we are phenomenologically analyzing our experience and existential condition, the progression and concrete conceptualization of such novel insights and experiential practicality of actions and time management can and, in my opinion (for our pursuit and journey to be optimal) be something we formulate consciously.

Care and Concern in Attention

The amount of time and concentration any content exacts from us is in exact relation to the amount of “care” or “concern” it has to the totality of our Being. Any phenomenal state that arises merely signifies its meaning to us, in some fashion or another, and we ought to manage the causal foundation from which it stems if we wish to alter our experience away from it. This can mean pursuance, integration, removal of dissonance, or reframing. One way or another, all content of experience is open to modification, and if it happens to be aversive to us, we ought to put forth effort towards its integration, and this doesn’t necessarily mean it needs to be carried out.

One manner of promoting our values is in a “negative” revelatory strategy. This requires analysis of those things which fill our consciousness, with which our attention is more prone to be consumed by, give a semblance of meaning, challenge, and desire by their very nature of our directedness towards them. These positive phenomenal states (not optimistically positive, but rather manifesting) provide a clue as to what we value. Whether it be a memory, a skill, a topic, a person, a saying, a thought or an emotion, if it is constantly arising into conscious awareness, and modifying our Being in accordance with it, it is safe to say that it is something we value, whether it is a consciously deduced value or unconsciously embodied. An undesired mental content that produces a conscious concentration despite our desire to remove it from experience, whether it’s a moment or a mode of being, or an archetypal pattern, is content that has “consumed” or “overtaken” the psyche, and it must be something we haven’t adequately overcome. If something is adequately overcome, then it is stored in the unconscious as the conquered bit of chaos which has become ordered. If something produces enough negative subjective experience in us, it is due to the value of that content being high for us. Its integration leads to the baseline of our development that we have moving forward, and while its temporal modification is still inextricably connected to us, our schematization of it allows us to accommodate novel situations to it, and simultaneously to assimilate the schema to those situations. In other words, it becomes part of our pragmatic toolkit.

Benefit of Dealing with Reoccurring Problems

By analysis of what negatively affects us, we not only progress towards the removal of accumulated problems, but we better equip ourselves, psychologically and on a neuroplasticity level, to be better able to deal with challenges that arise in the future. Thus we should seek to optimize our being towards the ability to deal with the totality of problems, through the progression of a fortified character that can do so, and we do this through the individual “problems”. Problems here are any content of subjective experience that we are aversive to, that create dissatisfaction in us, that aren’t consciously desired. Even a deficiency of a conscious desire can be seen as a problem, the rectification of which would be the overcoming either of the desire itself, or of the fulfillment of the desire. The overcoming of the unconquered and the progressing of character enables us to be wiser in our dealings with any problem in the future, and thus is well worth our time in pursuing.

Hardships in Value Pursuance

The silver lining in the case of a meaningful life, necessarily entails hardships, tribulations, unknowns, and their confrontation and conquering. Such potentialities of misfortune or loss should be clearly visualized, even in the extreme case, so that if they arrive, we can be prepared and have an idea of what it would look like to best handle them. This is encapsulated in the Stoic concept of “momento mori” or “remember death”, in which the visualization of the worst, and the ideal way in which to handle such loss is consciously clearly presented to the individual, so that he can embody the virtues and the mode of being he deems most appropriate towards the handling of such challenges while remaining faithful to the developed belief and value systems which give his life meaning. The strength of will to be supportive of family, rather than to be traumatized and a burden in time of a loss of a loved one, or in sickness and in misfortune, provide the individual and those he cares about the best version of oneself so as to aide in the alleviation of suffering. While this may not be a value inherent to everyone, and this is necessarily making a value judgment which, to me, is real and important, yet may not be uncovered as the optimal path by everyone, but as an example this type of visualization enables the individual to embody that image when or if the worst so comes. The visualization of worst case scenarios enables the individual to be the least hindered from deviation of his value system in the face of adversity, as well as provides him the opportunity for character growth despite great tragedy. Our worst fears, the suffering and the undeserving pain which befalls all of us, can be navigated so as to be a positive and beneficial experience in the progression of moral excellence. Rather than view our challenges in pursuance of our goals as a hindrance, which they are, we can simultaneously view them as stepping stones to greater competency in their navigation.

While on this journey the difficulties and tribulations which we previously forethought of may not be the only difficulties to arise, and more often than not, novel distractions and impediments to our wellbeing will constantly prove to be challenges to us in the progression of our being towards the goals which we establish in line with our value system. Seeing as expected or unexpected trials are inevitable in the pursuit of anything difficult, and what is meaningful is never easy, their emergence and handling is of utmost importance to us.

The most difficult situations are opportunities for the greatest victories in our lives. There is no sense of pride, personal growth, and inner peace, without a necessary struggle to overcome difficulty. The opportunity for virtue grows in the face of adversity. When the going gets tough it is the most difficult to do what is correct, to remain virtuous, to sustain from indulgence or resist the urge to escape from reality and what is honorable, for this reason it is in those very situations which we are afforded the greatest opportunity to overcome, and by doing so to advance our wisdom, virtues, and self-image. The pursuit of goals in accordance with the predefined value system, towards those objects of desire which may include but are not limited to skill improvement, character trait growth, psychological wellbeing, career aspirations, relationship development, all are noble and worthy goals to pursue, and in their progression all require necessary hardships.

Once we have a well-defined value system, and goals have been established with a rationalized pathway towards their attainment, we must voluntarily opt to overcome any difficulty that is a necessary prerequisite toward the achievement of the goals, and any other hindrance which diminishes the progression must be dealt with. There is a necessary distinction between the potential hardships which stand as obstacles towards goals one is not inclined to pursue, and those which are directly in the pathway towards the values which one does value. The pursuit of unnecessary difficulty for the sake of difficulty itself, may be useful towards the development of confidence and discipline, and general ability to withstand pain and suffering, but we are not urged by optimality to pursue such tasks. Here I am speaking of only those obstacles which lie directly in the path towards our pre-established values. The unnecessary waste of time and effort to do something difficult in a field which holds no value to the individual, must be tempered by the individual’s intentions and overall insight into the benefit of such pursuit. If an endeavor is not beneficial and useful, yet it is difficult, the endeavor must surely be shunned and not pursued. This isn’t to say that there isn’t potential for personal growth, just that the aim of goal attainment and the difficulty here described are of those which directly hinder one’s progress to their established goals.

In not becoming aversive to sickness, misfortune, and disagreeable situations, we can develop discipline, temperance, and the equanimity to be better equipped at handling problems in the future. It is the meaningful journey of developing morals in alignment with our values that sustains and provides the meaning in which we are looking for in life.

The skills used and gained in merely confronting difficult challenges with good intentions and a firm resolve itself is enough of a reward for opposing them. While we cannot, as a determined being, choose our fate, we can through knowledge acquisition, habit, discipline, and consistent testing, improve the deterministic precursors which manifest action in a way to conquer fate itself in every moment. The voluntary forging by fire method is undertaken by the man who wishes to improve his character while at the same time prove to himself his character is worthy of being respected. The positive subjective experience felt after attempting to overcome a difficult situation in which we are uncomfortable is naturally produced in any situation which is “foreign” to our currently developed mode of being and subsequent experiences. In other words, the confrontation and voluntary decision to attempt to overcome an unknown or challenging situation, produces an inbuilt biological reward. There is something inherent in us which seeks to discover, to explore, to expand our horizon of knowledge and understanding, and it is made into an object of which we can consciously “desire” by the subjective reinforcement of positive emotion in its acquisition. Whenever we learn something new, adapt to a novel situation, become comfortable in an area of which we previously didn’t know how to handle, whenever we travel and discover new places, gain insight into better ways to live, we always are psychologically rewarded by a positive emotion. This can be explained evolutionarily.

Encountering the Unknown

Our emotional system evolved in such a way to promote survivability and reproduction. Ledoux states that “memory is first and foremost a cellular function that facilitates survival by enabling the past to inform present or future cellular function, whether in a single-cell of multicellular organism. The same is true of much of the rest of our psychological life and its manifestations in our conscious minds.” The expansion of memory, and thus the neuronal circuitry which underlies cognitive capacity, is expanded only in the face of novel situations, which gives us good reason to believe that the brain would develop in such a way to promote the experience of overcoming novel, difficult, unknown, situations. The emotional response system signals a positive emotional state in the achievement of such actions, improving the individuals instinctive drive to pursue such interests in the future. The memory of the emotionally positive state produces by the reward system was evolutionary developed to improve the organisms desire to repeat the action, in an operant conditioned way. Currently, we can consciously recognize this ability and, in self-directed conditioned way, seek to consciously direct our behavior with the “reward” of psychological wellbeing in mind as the outcome of pursuit of the unknown.

Richard Dawkins uncovered that the survival circuit (connections between different neuronal areas of the brain) is employed by modern humans, as well as our ancestors, in the promotion of the genes goal. The “method” to which our genetic material uses in its goal of reproduction and survival is that of employing a survival machine (our bodies) to defend, feed, and work towards the goal of the genetic material. Being that we have the subjective experience of consciously directing the survival machine entails that the greater ability we contain to confront novel situations, and overcome them, the greater chance our genes have in their reproduction and survival. For our ancestors, the expansion of knowledge was directed towards the goal in ways such as environmental adaptability, threat recognition, cooperation within groups, etc. The expansion of territory in the uncovering of unknown grounds, enabled the individual to have cognitive access (whether unconsciously habitualized and reactionary, or conscious, depending on which point in development) to more food and water, shelter and habitational resources within his “known” domain, which increases the opportunity of different choices better suited to different situations. This developed improvement in knowledge of the immediate environment, its predators, and in dealing with other individuals of the same species, contributed to a better ability to navigate life so as to increase the odds of the individual surviving and reproducing. This trait in uncovering the unknown, in knowledge acquisition, and the genetic basis for the ability to learn, in general, would naturally be a trait selected for, as those less equipped mentally would necessarily have less success in navigating life towards the age of reproduction, and their genetic material would be less likely to be passed down.

Dr. Jordan Peterson explains the neuroscientific literature on the subject of exploration of the unknown in his Maps of Meaning lectures in a way which also coincides with the experiential notion we gain by pursuing the unknown. He explains that the desire to explore and the optimization of the psyche in accordance with it has been discovered to be located in the hypothalamus, which, not coincidentally, is the home of the dopaminergic system which serves as producing an experientially perceived pleasurable response to survival related activities such as eating and sex. The relatedness between the stimulation of the reward system and the biological urge to explore are inextricably connected in our hypothalamus, and give sufficient ground in explaining the benefit of physical territorial expansion, which in modern life, can be expanded to the novel exploration of the unknown both psychologically and within different fields of knowledge which are connected to our biological value system, which we here seek to make consciously explicit and to consciously direct ourselves in pursuit of. The reward of meaning pursual is thus adequately expressed in the neuroscientific literature in this way. Thus we have a philosophic, evolutionary, and psychological foundation for which to explain why pursuing challenges is not only pleasurable, in their completion, but also to why it arose in us and how it is beneficial to survival for our ancestors.

An important distinction must here be stated, that the evolutionary system that drove our ancestors to develop these cognitive attributes was directed towards survival, but now, in the current zeitgeist, we have access to the same system and its benefits with the additional stipulation that they can be acquired without the direct pursuit of survival related knowledge. People find pleasure in gaining knowledge in the study of ants, or myremecology, which surely is not in any way beneficial to our genes. The areas in which we can employ our ability to explore and confront difficulty are not limited by those which increase reproducibility of the genome. That being said, our conscious goals have likewise evolved into a myriad of different interests and pursuits, and regardless of our current value system, the basis for growth remains, and is rewarded in the same way in which uncovering distant territories, or new food sources, which worked for our ancestors.

Given the evolutionary benefit of “uncovering the unknown”, “learning”, “desire to explore”, and its subsequent physiological change to the brains relational reasoning, and thus “wisdom”, we can likewise carry on the tradition in a novel way. The acquisition of improved mental capacities, and the expansion of knowledge, evolutionarily, would necessarily entail a greater survivability, but for us, in the modern era, it can entail greater psychological wellbeing for him who is seeking growth in any given area of expertise, or character improvement, or overall wellbeing. The application of diligent striving in pursuit of a value which we have personally developed as being “important” is the necessary “meaning” which can provide us with purpose and thus psychological wellbeing as we move through life, and here we have a scientific basis for why this is so. The philosophical school of existentialism has described many methods of which we might find meaning, but here we have a combined production of evolutionary, psychological, and philosophical factors which denote the reason why pursuit of further growth towards an object with which we value, can, and does, produce the meaning with which we can hold as a mitigating factor in the question of existential dread and mitigates the suffering of existence.

Purpose and its Inextricable Link to Difficulty

The fact that such a system exists within us, rewarding us with positive emotion after attempting and specifically achieving difficult tasks, shows that we are built with a source of purpose that is tied into exploration of the unknown, as well as tied to moral duties. This is both biologically, and socially explainable, and is a major reason why virtue ethics, and the continued effort to improve one’s own character and focus on the greatest virtue one might be able to embody in the moment, is so widely accepted and implemented. This is why the stoics make sense to us, and why people choose to embody stoic philosophy in daily life. There is an intrinsic biological reward for consciously carrying down this path, and in viewing the world from a meaningful perspective expressed in the ability to act virtuous in every moment. We gain psychologically the power and embodiment of the wise old man archetype (Carl Jung), as well as reliving an individualized version of the heroes journey (Joseph Campbell). The hero goes out to enforce order upon chaos, to confront difficulty, for the good of the people. He encounters trials and tribulations, he falls down, he stands up and continues. He faces the ultimate source of tribulation, chaos embodied, which in our case is a difficulty which we do not currently known how to handle. In the persistent conscious decision to overcome, and in the victory over the “dragon”, or that which symbolizes a pressing difficult task, the individual receives the treasure, the gold, the fountain of youth, the immortal elixir, the philosophers stone. In our situation, he progresses in the direction of the area which he wishes to pursue, he gains in virtue, expertise, wisdom, or knowledge in a specific area. The hero then returns the boon to the people, he saves the world, he shares his loot with the broader society, and is hailed as a hero. We take the knowledge, the benefit, the gain acquired through difficulty, and are able to manifest the newly developed benefit in our interactions with others, in a way which is beneficial (if the goal is noble). We utilize our psyche to attempt to overcome unknown. In so doing, we organize the chaos in our lives, and we experience subjectively the greater ability to exert our power and influence on the world.

Phenomenological Analysis

The meaning seeking mode of being itself is something which can be elucidated by a phenomenological analysis, as can the mode that attempts to overcome challenges based upon these values. By understanding these modes of being, we can both understand our own nature, as well as the necessity for us to employ them. When analyzed retrospectively using a phenomenological method, the mode of being which is employed in the pursuit of meaning through opposing difficulty is marked by its intentionality, as is every noesis. The noesis here, we will denote as “difficulty opposition mode of being” which is marked by a noema which is abstractly defined as the conscious recognition of difficulty and conscious volition to confront and overcome it. The noetic characteristics here implies directionality tempered by temporality, in so far as the present moment is characterized by the pasts values directed towards future overcoming. Care or concern is uncovered as being directed upon a content which is valuable enough to be consciously assented to in its significance in overcoming. Therefore, in any matter of meaning pursuance, we ought to be embodying the values that authentically represent ourselves in our temporalized care structure.

In encountering difficulty, and embodying the mode of being which is voluntarily inclined towards its overcoming, we experience a negative emotional response in the perception of the object, but the mode of being modifies the object so it is simultaneously something which we strive toward. This noesis is more readily available the more we experience it, and we can more readily experience it through the pursuit of such difficult objectives, the positive feedback loop between the noema and noesis is strengthened. The more difficult situations we encounter, and in reciprocal fashion confront and oppose, the more the noesis is instantiated as a response to future novel unknown or difficult situations. The benefit of this mode of being is clearly seen in the individual’s reinforced psychological state in encountering difficulties in life, a benefit which necessarily entails an increase in wisdom (the ability to navigate life regardless of the situation). The secondary characteristics influenced by such a mode of being would be psychological confidence in confrontation, discipline in maintaining a value system regardless of external factors, and wellbeing produced by the meaning derived through such pursuits.

Existential Benefits of Meaning Pursuance

As we become more competent and efficient at embodying our values our ability to consciously direct our Being towards that mode of being previously described as “difficulty opposition mode of being” becomes more desired and readily available. The conscious recognition of our own carrying out of difficult tasks creates a psychological influence that lends itself to the dopaminergic strengthening of meaningful actions. As we strive on diligently in conscious pursuance of our values, we become the person we had the potential of becoming.

Of course this whole structure of biological imperative, moral imperative, will to overcome, benefit of overcoming suffering and difficulty, the meaning inherit in all these claims that arises from the nature of our being, the nature of the universe, is arising within a universe that ultimately that has no meaning in itself. It is only due to our being humans, due to us arising as beings that have the biological inclination to transform our experience into one in which meaning exists explicitly for us, albeit for the transient lengths of our short lives, that enables us to uncover the meaning which we always contained, and continue to contain as a potentiality. The meaning created in this meaningless framework truly does matter, yet only to us, as the experience of pleasure and pain in sentient beings is the necessary precondition for meaning and morality. The modification of our subjective experience through the pursuit of overcoming difficulty is one that isn’t a zero sum, we have more to gain from it than to lose. The time, effort, diligence, in pursuit of a value which is important to us, fills us with meaning, and entices us to strive on through this life filled with the slangs and arrows of misfortune.

On the Sick Mind and its Alleviation

Originally Written: March 11 2019

There is certain distinct characteristics unique to the sick man’s mind, which are deducible from a phenomenological analysis of the content of his experience, both while within the sickness, and in the mode of Being which follows its alleviation. Abstract functions and rumination on non-personal content are markedly reduced in the state of sickness, to be replaced with a predominantly selfish, life preservation concentration. We forfeit abstract relations for the purely practical alleviation of psychological suffering, based upon the physical condition of bodily distress. The brain, the totality of the organism, and thus, our own conscious intentionality, becomes pointed more predominantly upon the content of the present moment, and bodily experience, over the unnecessary excessive thought stream we normally find ourselves in. The normal anxieties and anticipatory reflections which plague our normal state of being, those thought patterns stemming from desire towards future states become effectively replaced to a higher degree by the death anxiety and the future state desired becomes almost universally dominated by the desire for health. The sick mind may attempt to distract his mode of being away from that directed towards health and alleviation of suffering, and may succeed in doing so, but it is only a layer above the mode which calls for intentionality to be directed towards alleviation of suffering. As physical wellbeing of the survival machine holds the most significance to the genetic material which our body is preconditioned to propagate to the future, the recognition of a problem in the survival machine and the conscious mode of being and its modification are in relation to the body’s interpretation of the threat to the system, and rightfully so. The perceptive bodily interpretation of an un-optimal physical condition thus arises into conscious awareness for the purpose of intentionality of the totality of the Being to be directed towards “fixing” the problem.

While our “normal” mode of being has been forged by the same biological necessities that are presupposed in the sick man’s Being, it oftentimes has evolved to desires and concentration on cultural and societally informed actions and activities, being, in themselves, deduced as being conducive to the wellbeing of the individual (also formed through a biologically grounded value system). While these “normal” desires, whether it be a pleasant emotional state, career advancement, fame, family, social dominance, or any other rising in societies hierarchies, it is one step removed from the closest to home biological desire or imperative, the survival of the organism’s genetic material. Thus, we may normally be absorbed in drama with friends or family, in career dilemmas, in bettering ourselves in terms of education, wealth, standing, or merely directed towards pleasure and entertainment. Sickness calls us, in fact, it pushes us, towards the recognition of our own Being, and its current state, whether we are engulfed in foreign content or not. This very push towards self-reflective intentionality arising in conscious awareness, necessarily is a change from the “normal” mode of being, which is conditioned by linguistic conceptualizations and societal influence, and is transmuted into the merely personal, “primitive”, self-awareness and desire for health. The marked change may be noticed in this way of highly unproductive, unindustrious, less conducive to conscious goals and values, a diversion from our dreams and aspirations, but, it holds within it the potentiality for further growth, is fully analyzed.

This growth I speak of isn’t merely the growth that stems from survival, in the immediate concentration of removing the sickness, but growth individually in virtue and in psychological health, in abstract thinking and philosophical improvement. But how can sickness produce this? How can the mode of being that distracts us from our aims move us further towards them? This sounds counter intuitive, but if the mode of being which follows the alleviation of sickness is adequately phenomenologically analyzed, the conclusion I have come to will be made clear.

Immediately following the alleviation of the sickness, as the mind reorients itself to its aims and aspirations in line with conscious value structures, its reformulation necessarily rekindles from a mode of being that is no longer over encumbered by the anxieties and stressors that have built up consciously prior to the sickness. While problems still exist, and anxieties and aspirations that were held beforehand may still be held, their complexity and our anxiety toward them is effectively reduced by the acquisition of the aim of our previous mode of being’s desire, that of health. In the mode of being sick we are entirely focused upon alleviating sickness, almost to the exclusion of everything else. Once this singular aim has been reached, the mind becomes predominantly free of anxiety and “sees the world afresh” in that the problems beforehand that were perceived as “large problems” have effectively been reduced in size as the coming face to face with death, at least perceptively, has reduced their influence. It seems as if sickness has brought sanity from the depths of our unconscious to illuminate the distraught conscious. As sickness diverted our aims and conscious experience, it simultaneously provided us with the opportunity to pursue our aims afterwards with a reinvigorated, and “clear” consciousness.

Being sick is unfortunate and unpleasant in the subjective experience of its effect on the body and psyche, but the post product always presents itself as a mode of being whose previous concerns had been wiped away by the concentration of the welfare of the body, producing afterwards a “clear mind” of sorts which is able to produce novel intuitions and embark upon fresh explorations without being encumbered by the prior mental formations. The buildup of prior mental formations clouded the conscious experience in their range and influence, but upon their extended removal, it opens us up to a new mode of being. This new mode of being following sickness can be directed towards previous aims, but from a starting point that is better equipped to intuit novel solutions, to more clearly see, in new ways, which are unhindered by prior mental formations, towards the success of those aims. While we retain knowledge and memory, conscious experience itself has been removed of unnecessary anxieties. While these anxieties, and formations, are likely to be replaced by new ones as time compounds, we notice a renewed existence after sickness has been cleared up, producing a starting point upon which we left, yet is markedly more peaceful, and less distracted by anxiety and unpleasant emotion, as the health acquired in alignment with the desire to alleviate sickness produces the reward in its resolution.

The old thought patterns, worries, and ideologies show their insignificance any time we are confronted with an experience that threatens our existence, as sickness surely reminds us of our temporal nature. Thus, we become grounded, and renewed after the sickness, if only to be replaced by new thought streams and the ordinariness of everyday consciousness within days or hours. But in that window of sickness, and immediately after, there are subjectively unique states of mental experience which can be noted, and I have described here one perspective of their nature and how I experience them personally. Whether this is universal or not remains to be examined, but I tend to see the periods of sickness as a psychologically positive occurrence, in the cleansing of long ruminated thoughts, and the ability to be more concentrated on new content afterwards. From a philosophical standpoint, this is highly useful, in that sometimes thought patterns and goals can become overthought, over considered, and expounded upon till they become more of an impediment than progressive. Whether this effect of sickness in removing this towards the fresh conscious experience which can move in novel directions, not in direct alignment with previous formations, is unique, or solely beneficial in regards to scientific and philosophically minded individuals, remains to be verified externally. In the phenomenological analysis of different types of personalities, and in domains of different interests, it has yet to be reported that sickness has a similar benefit to the individuals who come out the other side, but for me, personally, in my temperament and interests I see a conscious benefit and distinct characteristics in the mode of being sick and its following alleviation, in which I intuit as being positive towards the creation and articulation of novel ideas, and the removal of long held “overthinking” of “less than optimal” anxieties and aspirations.

Projection and Recognition of Jungian Archetypes and other Psychological Classificatory Structures

Originally Written: March 3rd 2019

While Plato’s Forms provides an explanation for our limited conceptualization abilities in how the conceptualization is related to the collective co-understanding of phenomena, it lacks phenomenological evidence as to its claims of our access to the permanency of concepts. It claims to deduce a linking between individual conceptualization and the totality of knowledge, but it is unverifiable in experience, and incompatible with modern scientific understanding of linguistics. The forms regarded as the source of our concepts of objects in themselves, we are told they are from which we draw our understanding of objects in ourselves, from a transcendental realm which we draw from. The case is, we conceptualize bottom up, not from a transcendental realm down to the conscious, but from the genetically inherited on up to conscious understanding –  from our sensory and bodily perceptions, filtered through the biologically ingrained value systems, up to conscious manifestation. Regardless of the efficacy of Plato’s rationale, the understanding of how our perception and linguistic systems formulate conceptualizations in regards to objects is useful to an understanding of ourselves, and these are, as he regarded, shared amongst the set of all humans, to a degree. While we don’t necessarily have access to a realm of forms in which to draw our concepts from, there are internal consistencies in regards to evolutionary structures and aspects of our psyches that we can uncover as modifying our perceptions and thus our experience in the way in which our value system filters content, and influences our actions. Towards these collective unconscious foundations, Carl Jung has delineated several that markedly present themselves in our own Being, and are recognizable across cultures and languages. These aspects of the collective unconscious which are relics as well as influencers, affecting our development and our current experience, Jung defined as archetypes. The formulation and social implications of concepts is developed by our minds in the organizing of symbolic representations of reality, the concepts themselves do not exist outside of us, rather they exist below our conscious instantiation of action. Their definitions are modified by us, their linguistic “creation” is done by us, and their usage and application is derived from the neural structure within us. While these archetypes are surely unconscious, we can recognize our relation to them, and their essential structures, at least in part, through methods of introspection and in recognizing projections.

It is useful in the continuing development of one’s own psyche to have a personal experience of recognizing the emergence of archetypal personalities, more so than a merely conceptual, scholarly understanding of the concepts used to denote them. While our own individual psyche may not have had an archetypal personality rise to the surface and manifest itself in complete possession of the mind, which would be obvious upon retrospect, it often is the case that the archetypes merely manifest themselves in certain modes of being, small periods of time, in our perceptions, evaluations, judgments, and actions. While it is rare that a single aspect of our psyche hijacks the entire system, their interrelated influences upon our lives is available to be deduced by a phenomenological analysis of the content of our own subjective experience. Whether the archetypes are obviously presented or not, we can always recognize their influence within us in some way. It will be useful for this exercise to have a conceptual understanding of what the shadow, the anima, the trickster, the wise old man, and the hero archetypes mean mythologically as well as a knowledge of the analytic psychology tradition and their roles in the psyche.

The most popular method in recognizing features of these personalities as existing within our own unconscious psyche is through reflective conscious recognition of their manifestations in relation to adequately defined characteristics of their essence, yet, here I am posing another method. Through identification of the manifestation of them interpersonally, we can utilize our personal relationships in discovering how we have projected these personalities onto others, and in noticing how our distinct relationships cause a modification of our own mode of Being, look to how and why that being is modified in such a manner. Often times others seem to reflect characteristics which we subjectively notice as being in a certain meaningful relation to us, whether it is in representing a pattern common to certain archetypes, or whether it is something agreeable, disagreeable, etc. In analyzing our individual response and interpretation of others manifestations, and our reactions to them, we can learn about the structures which have developed within us to produce such judgments or perceptions. The way in which we perceive and judge others, is necessarily formulated through our current inbuilt value system, and in recognizing our subjective experience in how and what perceptions arise to conscious awareness, we can learn, not only of the values and beliefs in which we use to perceive and signify content of consciousness, but also of the archetypal structure which has been unconsciously at play in our own psyches. By recognizing that a certain person displays qualities that relate to the mythological formulations of the archetype, we can narrow them down and find if we are projecting an archetypal image onto them. Apart from analysis in this way, the feeling someone gives us can point us in the right direction in determining the archetype projected onto the individual.

Conversely, once we have realized that a person contains traits that are comparable to a previously conceptualized archetype, and identified that archetype, we can further analyze that individuals’ character and personality, and understand something about ourselves through our own repetition of similar actions and traits stemming from the psychological state. In other words, we notice that those traits they are embodying can be categorized into an archetypal structure, and extrapolate that those qualities we notice in others are noticed due to our own perceptive system containing a representation of them unconsciously. We contain the traits, and the evaluation, that make up our interpretation of the archetype represented in the other person. Perhaps these regarded archetypes in our own experience have previously possessed the psyche, came to the forefront and revealed themselves, maybe they are suppressed, or maybe they have previously been integrated and accepted into the whole. Regardless, the traits within the projection, if they are noticed, can be learned to be qualities of potential we contain within, as the way through which we view the world, the perspectives, ideas, feelings and actions which we embody in experience is conditioned by the archetypal influence upon the unconscious, the conscious conceptualization arising out of that inbuilt structure. By consciously recognizing a projection of a previously conceptualized classification, whether it’s a Jungian classification of an archetype, or personality, or otherwise, we become enabled to see how that archetype is at play within our own daily lives, and how it is affecting our own minds.

For example, if we find an individual which we despise, hate, regard as immoral, holding beliefs and values completely opposite of our own, perhaps we have discovered, through our own judgment and our awareness of it, a projection of our own shadow. That feeling of disgust in viewing or experiencing that individual, in noticing these phenomena in our perception of another as representing at least some aspects of immorality and content we wish not to be part of our own character, we effectively learn something about the constitution of our own character, and its developed relationship to morality. The reason this hate arises, or the negative connotation we embody in relation to that person, is due to it being a projection of an unconscious archetype of the shadow within ourselves, we are recognizing outside of ourselves, part of ourselves, through an internal process. The only reason that reaction would take place, is if that external idea, or archetype, has been developed within us prior. This isn’t saying it has manifested or taken over our psyche, just that it exists as potentiality, or as influencing manifestations we don’t recognize as derivatives of that source. Our own inner comprehension of the shadow is what enables us to perceive others as immoral, manifesting an inner feeling of repulsion, dislike, unpleasant emotion, and other such negative modes of being conditioned by the perception of the individual embodying the archetype. We unconsciously contain the potential for all the same actions which reflect personality traits, and they can be symbolized and conceptualized with the overarching term of shadow, as well as seen to be present in the other person. In consciously recognizing a projection of an archetype, and then drawing the conclusion that this archetypal understanding and projection is a symbolic representation of the inner content, we can connect our interpersonal discoveries reflexively to understand our own psychological inclinations and their underpinnings.

All archetypal conceptualizations become inherited to a greater or lesser degree in a nascent state, containing universal hereditary and shared functionality as biological structures. Through development, a second layer is developed above the initial inclinations which affect our perceptions, and become modified by individual experience, culture, society. We have the blueprint in which our Being is constituted from the start, in the perceptive value structure and the ability to recognize and relate to phenomena in a specific way, as inherited by our genetic material, and psychologically conceptualized, additionally, in archetypal structures. Both conceptually delineated systems, the biological, and the archetypal, become modified as we develop from that initial starting point, they build upon the foundation that is inherited in vast, yet limited and guided directions.

The personal nature of the archetypal layer of the unconscious naturally grows out of the universal unconscious, as does the personal shadow archetype grows from the original propensity to have a shadow that is inherit in humans and has the same qualities across all mankind. What you perceive as projected is necessarily a combination of both, as the foundation lies inherent and is built upon and modified by the subjective experience. This process, recognition, and structure is shared among all the basic, large, Jungian archetypes. As Jung said, it shouldn’t be forgotten that these archetypes are impossible to pin down and define, and seriously are unconscious, but we can still obtain, an albeit small inference, into their nature and their roles in our lives by understanding them broadly and abstaining from ever admitting that our conscious conception is all encompassing nor sufficiently precise.  Basically, it takes one to know one.

Universal Existentialism, Its Manifestations, Absurdism, Solipsism

Originally Written: February 22nd 2019

All humans follow a philosophical existentialist doctrine, whether or not they recognizing or fully become conscious of it. It isn’t a necessary precondition to meaning seeking to recognize the absurdity, or meaninglessness of existence. One doesn’t have to be interested in formal philosophy, to follow a philosophically analyzable lifestyle, and the same applies to our pursuit of meaning. I think humans are hardwired to seek meaning, and to follow it, whether it is the will to survive and preserve the organism, or protect one’s family, or pursue success, everyone unknowingly follows a meaningful path that exists in an un-meaningful world. Thus, anyone who hasn’t killed themselves, has essentially followed some source of meaning and purpose whether they consciously know or accept that fact. Even the staunchest nihilist is a hypocrite in this regard, they are still breathing, they find some meaning in being alive, even in the worst case if it solely is the biological imperative, their being, the totality of the individual, has found some meaning in this existence. Solely stating that life has no meaning, and that meaning is un-findable, doesn’t make it true. Ones actions say otherwise. From an objective perspective, life has no meaning, in its particulars or in its totality, but all life has convinced itself, at least at the lowest level, evolved, so that it believes, or acts out the belief, that there is some reason to live. Life keeps on living, regardless of its meaningless place in the continuity of the world. Thus, all life, that is, somehow, miraculously, still alive, has a meaning in reference to itself that is sustaining its life. Whether this is consciously conceptualized, or not, it exists in all life that is not attempting to annihilate itself.

A rock thrown across the yard has no objective purpose to continue moving in that direction it was thrown, and will keep moving till it reaches its destination, it is simply the laws of physics at work, and if the rock was conscious of its own existence, and became aware of the physics moving it across the yard, and the inability for things to be otherwise, whether his thought mattered objectively or not, he could consciously believe that following that path he is on inevitably matters, revolt against the nihilistic tendency of reality, be happy with his situation and find a transitory purpose in moving to that determined location. This understanding, acceptance, consciousness, and transitory meaning I believe to be truer to reality as well as more psychologically beneficial than holding the belief that one has the “power” to move out of the laws of physics governing the situation inevitably. This revolt against meaningless, and the acceptance of a transitory meaning within this world where death is a given, is the solution of absurdism given by Camus.

We are the rock thrown. We can realize that the universe is at work, that we are part of it all, we are just an aspect of the physics of all nature, becoming conscious of ourselves, and while we can see that from an objective, external source, our lives have no meaning, as they are positioned in a meaningless world, we can accept our condition, smile at the absurdity, accept it, and revolt against the meaninglessness by creating or following values we ultimately know to be valueless, outside of ourselves and other life. Life is the criteria for meaning.

Some conclusionary states that a human may find themselves in, in regards to meaning are: 1) consciously finding the meaning inherit in the physics which created our biology which makes up the fundamental levels of our psyche which pushes us to survive, or 2) unconsciously following that meaning, or a meaning, without realizing it, one way or another staying alive or 3) while following that biological, psychologically inherit deterministic meaning, also become conscious of the absurdity, that meaning itself, and then create a further abstract ideology, morality, or system of meaning in addition to that which is naturally within all life, additionally in all human life, etc., 4) be unaware of our place in the universe, unaware of absurdity, yet consciously create a structure of meaning to be fulfilled in the world, or have a psychologically more pleasant experience through various sources such as the adoption of responsibility or pursuing something your psyche/culture/influences has deemed important or meaningful. 

Proposition 1) It is possible to believe that every moment in your subjective experience has meaning, every thought you experience, word you say, action you take has meaning. It’s possible to do this because these things all become prior causes with future effects. Thus you are impacting the future. The problem comes when objectively stating that this impact matters at all, is good or bad. This in turn, depends on the perspective, or lack of perspective, taken. When examined from a life-form, proposition 1 matters in its ability to affect the subjective experience of the being, for better or worse, in the present or in the future. Thus, where there is life, there is an importance to one’s action, from the perspective of that life which can be affected. But from the perspective of the universe, or from the inanimate, the nonliving, from reality as a whole, or as a collective of all its constituents, there is no meaning, as there is no reference, no individual, no experience, no consciousness, no suffering and pleasure, no better or worse state, thus no importance, no good or bad in proposition 1 “Answer to the Absurdist Conundrum”. Thus, being that we are life, and being that we want a beneficial experience, and recognizing there is other life, and other people are able to have better or worse experiences, better or worse conscious states, we are able to 1) act out unconsciously a (biologically/socially/culturally reinforced) system of ethics, 2) consciously adopt someone else’s or some organizations, system of thought or ethics, etc. or 3) consciously reason out a reasoned philosophical system of ethics, and develop morality, with a spectrum of integrity and thoroughness, and a range of influences and factors, yet consciously compiled.

Once consciously considered, one may ask how do I most honestly articulate where this morality comes from? I propose, through phenomenological means, or introspection, and the primacy of subjective data given through our experience, including; meditation, mindfulness, contemplation, philosophizing in general, studying other philosophers work, talking to others, wisdom gained from experience, etc. Maybe one asks, what are the basic constituents that must come into being to create morality? I propose that this is best articulated as morality comes into place once we take into account our own situation, of being alive, and our own conscious states (self-interest – in either its rational or irrational forms), and the existence of other life forms in a similar situation. It’s absurd to consider that a nonliving object would take on a moral code or act morally. As for itself, and for everything outside itself, from its perspective, the possibility of better or worse situations is nil. Life itself implies meaning, and the existence of life outside oneself logically produces morality, that is, at least from my perspective, as I believe other life has consciousness and an experience similar to mine, therefore better and worse states, therefore my actions truly matter in that they affect other life form’s experience.

If you reject the claim that any other being has consciousness, an experience, or that that experience can be better or worse in some way or another (solipsism), then you reject morality and our ability of effecting others. A question arose to me in considering this, could morality exist in this type of universe? You cannot deny that your own conscious has better or worse states, “Basic Moral Realism”, and perhaps morality, stripped of external meaning, stripped of belief in other beings’ consciousness, can at its base find morality, good and bad, in how thoughts/speech/actions are proceeding effects that are produced within itself, producing better or worse states. In this way it’s possible to produce a morality only concerned with oneself, placing good and bad value on what is better or worse for yourself, in terms of suffering and wellbeing. This value judgment exists upon the spectrum of what one considers is better for oneself, in one’s hierarchical value structure, it could be; hedonistic pleasure, usefulness, growing towards truth, etc. As philosophical positions and focuses can vary, their ethical systems naturally express the ideas behind each respectively. This says nothing about different philosophies and their overall ranking in a hierarchy which we ourselves create, or, to confuse the subject one last time, says nothing about the meaningless of every philosophy as it relates to a non-living phenomenon, including the universe or reality or time, themselves.

On Duty

Originally Written: February 13th 2019

Duties were originally conceived through evolutionary means, as modes of encouraging action which serve to benefit the individual, family, group, or species survival and propagation. As groups and civilizations formed the duties of its individuals became expected as they contributed to the success of the group, and the survival of the family. It is easy to imagine how incentive played a role in forming duties. Both punishment and reward could have been reinforcing of the earliest duties, both socially and naturally. With the advent of language these duties became conceptualized and thus put into the social context, reinforced further through culture, formed as taboos by not conforming, and at the advent of a formal governing system, laws were instantiated to support these norms. Communities in their whole, and in their individuals, either benefited or suffered by the instantiated norms or laws, in relation to the product of which, they became modified in an evolutionary manner. Where it became a net benefit to the society through the adoption of responsibility and the carrying out of one’s duties to family, community and state, the expectation and its action became reinforced. In today’s age many duties have become almost universal as they are found across the globe with a surprising amount of consistency. We have political systems that enforce social contracts, holding the individual responsible for promises, and we have developed cultural and social expectations which judge the individual based on the duties he does or does not responsibly carry out.

As a caveat, deviations do exist as progressive viewpoints have been experimented with in pointed directions, and those areas which are still catching up in the use of reason in advancing primitive, mainly religious, morals. As a generalization, the consistency of the majority and the perennial re-occurrence of specific duties, in the form of laws and consistently valued responsibilities, shows there is a good reason to believe these duties, as well as morals, developed from a common evolutionary rooting, and progressed in a similar direction due to the factors which are common amongst humans. This leads one to believe in the universality of duties and morals as their progression has good reasoning backing it in contrast with the difficult to defend and dishonest appearance of relativism, as expounded upon in “Basic Moral Realism”. We are currently in a place where the duties of the individual are culturally outlined, well known, and carried out by the majority, detailed to correspond to every phase of life, all springing through this collective empowering of the duties of the individual. This isn’t to say that these culturally supported duties aren’t fallible, corruptible, and able to head in directions that are unagreed on by society.

Many are liable to rebel against culturally accepted duties as civilization changes, in a variety of ways and situations. Those duties that have stood the test of time and are still respected today we take for granted, but they all were developed in this manner, that is, stemming from biologically beneficial purposes, to familial benefitting purposes, expanded to the tribal and later the state levels. Culture tweaks as times change, and we are left with our current duties, which reflect in their abstract articulations the same duties in which the human species valued thousands of years ago that led to our survival. Things such as the care for young by the mother through feeding, the gathering and hunting for food and physical protection by the men, now has become things such as providing the financial support of children through education, providing for their survival (food and shelter) through stable employment. The same abstract duties still are unquestionably expected by parents, the differences obviously are the means and forms at which they are manifested.

The autonomy of the single individual, and his (including in progressive countries – her) responsibility to be dependent, relying on themselves to provide for their own care in adulthood has also stood the test of time. In any epoch of human history, a codependent human, or someone who takes and relies on others more than gives or contributes, is a liability, and is never high in the hierarchy. Certain virtues and strength of character have been valued, although all morality must be brought to situational accounts dictated by prudence and wisdom, as outlined in “Precursor to Wisdom Ethics”. Certain individual virtues have been praised for thousands of years such as honesty, reliability, equanimity, compassion, hard work, perseverance, dedication, loyalty, justice, as well as vices rejected, such as deception, rashness, foolishness, laziness, or injustice. The duty of the “good” man to follow the former and the detriment to the “bad” man in not, has been explained and accepted as far back as Aristotle, duties themselves being explicitly expanded upon by Cicero. There’s good reasons for how and why our current duties developed, and good reasons as to why we should follow most of them.

If we are to cope with existing in a meaningless world in a beneficial way, while still acknowledging the experience of our own subjectivity, that is, if we wish to live in a psychologically healthy state (not consumed by unwholesome, unpleasant emotions) as well as a physically healthy state (not suffering in pain, hunger, etc.), we must not forget our duties to the community, each other, the state, of which we are a part of no matter if we desire to be or not. This isn’t saying to be a slave to the masses or the government overlords, rather that there is something crucial being said just in the abstract articulation of common duties, there are lessons to learn and ways to improve, they have become unconscious, and unrecognized as time has habituated us to their normalcy. There is much to be gained in the understanding and exploring of these duties we feel to by implied by our culture, they have been forged by our ancestors, forged by evolution, by millions of years, by the universe itself.